In their swirling, dramatic forms, baroque art, architecture, and music might seem to
be the opposite of the emphasis on reason that marked the Scientifi c Revolution and
the Enlightenment, and to some degree they are. We can fi nd some overarching themes
in all the intellectual and cultural developments of the seventeenth and eighteenth
centuries, however. Scientists, philosophers, writers, artists, and composers, and the
people who read, saw, heard, and discussed their works in clubs, coffeehouses, salons,
newspapers, and journals were interested in issues of order and structure. What were
the underlying structures of the universe? Of human society? Of the individual? How
did people learn these? How could natural structures be reproduced, or enhanced?
Should they be? How could social structures be improved? Should they be? Could
disorderly things be made orderly? Were there limits to human nature, or were individuals
infi nitely improvable? All individuals, or just some? Were there limits to human
knowledge and understanding? If so, who or what set those limits?
The answers to many of these questions had long been provided by religious authorities,
but, as we will see in the next chapter, religious institutions were themselves deeply
split by concerns about structure and order in these centuries. So instead many people
looked to other types of authorities as well, or developed new ways to contemplate the
universe and the place of humans in it for themselves. Physicians, chemists, and alchemists
observed and experimented on the natural world in order to discover underlying
patterns and substances. Astronomers such as Galileo searched the skies with the newly
invented telescope, and mathematicians such as Newton posited laws to explain how
basic forces worked. Philosophers increasingly argued that reason – given to humans
by God and by nature – was the best tool for understanding the world, though most
thought that the capacity for rational thought varied widely among different types
of people. Concern with order and the limits of human understanding emerged in
literature as well, including poetry, comedies, and serious plays performed in theatres,
courts, and schools, and the new genre of the novel. Many of these works focused on
contemporary people confronting realistic problems instead of on classical heroes or
ancient kings. Art and music saw giant works on a huge scale – baroque churches,
enormous palaces, opera – but also smaller, more refl ective pieces that attempted to
capture individual personalities and intimate spaces.
None of the questions that people addressed through science, philosophy, literature,
art, or music provoked a uniform answer, but by the end of the eighteenth century the
number of people thinking, talking, and writing about them, at least in the larger cities
of Europe, was far greater than had been the case two centuries earlier. This expansion
of what Renaissance humanists called the “Republic of Letters” did not include the
vast majority of the European population, who remained agricultural producers living
in villages, but it was an important part of the creation of what was later termed
“middle-class” culture. This broadening was also accompanied by a growing split between
professional and amateur. Though there were many popularizations of scientifi c
and philosophical works, scientifi c advances increasingly required expensive equipment
and an understanding of mathematics beyond the reach of most people. Musical forms
such as the opera or the oratorio were not for singing or playing at home. People did
share in such things, but as audiences, not participants. These two trends – broadening
and professionalization – are actually linked, because both created a larger market
for many types of cultural products. By the end of the eighteenth century, culture was
a commodity to be purchased, through paintings for a sitting room, tickets to performances,
subscriptions to journals, or visits to museums. The “Republic of Letters” had
become the “market place of ideas,” a new metaphor appropriate in an increasingly
commercialized world.
Thomas Kuhn’s The Structure of Scientifi c Revolutions ( Chicago: University of Chicago Press ,
1962), is brief and very readable, as is Peter Dear’s Revolutionizing the Sciences: European
Knowledge and its Ambitions, 1500–1700 ( Princeton: Princeton University Press , 2001),
which explores continuities between seventeenth-century and earlier science. Jürgen
Habermas, The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of
Bourgeois Society, trans. Thomas Burger and Frederick Lawrence ( Cambridge, MA : MIT Press ,
1989), is a bit more ponderous.
Studies of new cultural institutions include James E. McClellan III , Science Reorganized:
Scientifi c Societies in the Eighteenth Century ( New York : Columbia University Press , 1985);
Elizabeth L. Eisenstein, Grub Street Abroad: Aspects of the French Cosmopolitan Press from the
Age of Louis XIV to the French Revolution ( Oxford : Oxford University Press , 1992); Geoffrey V.
Sutton, Science for a Polite Society: Gender, Culture, and the Demonstration of Enlightenment
(Boulder: University of Colorado Press , 1995); Paula Findlen, Possessing Nature: Museums,
Collecting and Scientifi c Culture in Early Modern Italy ( Berkeley: University of California Press ,
1996); David Zaret , Origins of Democratic Culture: Printing, Petitions and the Public Sphere
in Early-Modern England ( Princeton: Princeton University Press , 2000); James Van Horn
Melton, The Rise of the Public in Enlightenment Europe ( Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press , 2001); David Freedberg , The Eye of the Lynx: Galileo, his Friends, and the Beginnings
of Modern Natural History ( Chicago: University of Chicago Press , 2003); Joad Raymond,
ed., News Networks in Seventeenth Century Britain and Europe ( London: Routledge, 2006);
Margaret C. Jacob, Strangers Nowhere in the World: The Rise of Cosmopolitanism in Early
Modern Europe ( Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press , 2006).
Dorinda Outram, The Enlightenment, 2nd edn ( Cambridge: Cambridge University Press ,
2005), provides a solid one-volume introduction to the topic, and Thomas Munck, The
Enlightenment: A Comparative Social History ( New York : Bloomsbury , 2000), examines the
1 What new cultural institutions developed
in seventeenth- and eighteenth-century
Europe, and how did these shape public
opinion?
2 How did alchemical ideas contribute to
the development of new methods of
scientifi c inquiry?
3 How did Brahe, Kepler, and Galileo
modify Copernicus’s ideas about
planetary motion? What tools and
techniques allowed them to do this?
4 What was the impact of mathematical
principles on astronomy, philosophy, and
government administration in the
seventeenth and eighteenth centuries?
5 Descartes, Spinoza, Leibniz, and Locke all
developed explanations for how humans
come to know things. What similarities
and differences were there in their ideas
about the sources and limits of human
knowledge?
6 For thinkers of the Enlightenment, how
did climate, race, and gender affect
people’s capacity for reason and natural
rights?
7 How did political theories, science, and
Enlightenment values shape the literature,
music, and art of the seventeenth
and eighteenth centuries?
8 What qualities typifi ed baroque art,
architecture, and music, and how were
these expressed through new forms of
production, display, and performance
that were developed in this era?
FURTHER READING
QUESTIONS
impact of the Enlightenment on ordinary people. For historians and books mentioned in
the box on the changing shape of the Enlightenment, see Peter Gay , The Enlightenment:
An Interpretation, 2 vols. ( New York : W. W. Norton , 1966 and 1969); Robert Darnton , The
Literary Underground of the Old Regime ( Cambridge, MA : Harvard University Press , 1985);
Margaret C. Jacob, Living the Enlightenment: Freemasonry and Politics in Eighteenth-Century
Europe ( New York : Oxford University Press , 1991); Roy Porter , The Creation of the Modern
World: The Untold Story of the British Enlightenment ( New York : W. W. Norton , 2001); Dena
Goodman, The Republic of Letters: A Cultural History of the French Enlightenment ( Ithaca,
NY : Cornell University Press , 1994); Reinhart Kosseleck, Critique and Crises: Enlightenment
and the Pathogenesis of Modern Society ( Boston: MIT Press , 1998); Peter Hulme and Ludmilla
Jordanova , The Enlightenment and its Shadows ( London: Routledge, 1990); Steven Kale,
French Salons: High Society and Political Sociability from the Old Regime to the Revolution of
1848 ( Baltimore : Johns Hopkins University Press , 2006); Jonathan Israel, Radical Enlightenment:
Philosophy and the Making of Modernity ( Oxford : Oxford University Press , 2002) and the
much briefer Democratic Enlightenment: Philosophy, Revolution, and Human Rights ( Oxford :
Oxford University Press , 2011); Laurent Dubois, A Colony of Citizens: Revolution and Slave
Emancipation in the French Caribbean, 1787–1804 ( Durham: University of North Carolina Press ,
2006); Daniel Carey and Lynn Festa, eds., The Postcolonial Enlightenment: Eighteenth-Century
Colonialism and Postcolonial Theory ( New York : Oxford University Press , 2010).
Brief general surveys of the Scientifi c Revolution include Steven Shapin, The Scientifi c
Revolution ( Chicago: University of Chicago Press , 1998), which argues that there wasn’t
one, and John Henry , The Scientifi c Revolution and the Origins of Modern Science, 2nd
edn ( Basingstoke: Palgrave-Macmillan, 2002), which argues that there was. Margaret J.
Osler , ed., Rethinking the Scientifi c Revolution ( Cambridge: Cambridge University Press ,
2000), includes articles that take both positions. For the culture of science, see Lisa Jardine ,
Ingenious Pursuits: Building the Scientifi c Revolution ( London: Anchor , 2000). On magic and
alchemy in science, see Charles Webster , From Paracelsus to Newton: Magic and the Making
of Modern Science ( Cambridge: Cambridge University Press , 1982), and Bruce T. Moran,
Distilling Knowledge: Alchemy, Chemistry, and the Scientifi c Revolution ( Cambridge, MA :
Harvard University Press , 2010). On Newton, see Michael White’s very readable biography,
Isaac Newton: The Last Sorcerer ( London: Perseus Group , 1999). On issues relating to women
and science, see Londa Schiebinger , The Mind Has No Sex? Women in the Origins of Modern
Science ( Cambridge, MA : Harvard University Press , 1989).
The most authoritative studies of seventeenth-century political philosophers remain the
works of Quentin Skinner : The Foundations of Modern Political Thought, 2 vols. ( Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press , 1978), and Visions of Politics, 3 vols. ( Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press , 2002).
On the changing culture of art and music, see Thomas E. Crow , Painters and Public Life in
Eighteenth-Century Paris ( New Haven : Yale University Press , 1985); Simon McVeigh , Concert Life
in London from Mozart to Haydn ( Cambridge: Cambridge University Press , 1993); John Butt,
Music Education and the Art of Performance in the German Baroque ( Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press , 1994); James H. Johnson, Listening in Paris: A Cultural History ( Berkeley:
University of California Press , 1995); Pamela H. Smith and Paula Findlen, eds., Merchants and
Marvels: Commerce, Science, and Art in Early Modern Europe ( New York : Routledge, 2002).
For more suggestions and links see the companion website www.cambridge.org/wiesnerhanks .
NOTES
1 Immanuel Kant, “An Answer to the Question: What is Enlightenment?” (1784), in James
Schmidt, ed. and trans., What is Enlightenment? Eighteenth-Century Answers and
Twentieth-Century Questions ( Berkeley: University of California Press , 1996), p. 58.
2 Johannes Kepler, The Harmony of the World (1619), trans. E. J. Aiton, A. M. Duncan, and J. V.
Field, Memoirs of the American Philosophical Society, vol. CCIX ( Philadelphia: American
Philosophical Society , 1997), p. 304.
3 Montesquieu, The Spirit of the Laws, book 17, “How the laws of political servitude bear a
relation to the nature of the climate,” at www.constitution.org/cm/sol__11_17.htm#002 .
4 Ibid., book 16.
5 David Hume, “ Of National Characters ,” in The Philosophical Works of David Hume, vol. III
(Boston: Little, Brown and Company , 1854), p. 228.
6 Condorcet, Sketch for a Historical Picture of the Progress of the Human Mind, from Modern History
Sourcebook, ed. Paul Halsall, at www.fordham.edu/halsall/mod/condorcet-progress.html .
7 Ibid.
8 Jean-Jacques Rousseau, Emile, trans. Allan Bloom ( New York : Basic Books , 1979), p. 358.
9 Translated and quoted in Jane Bowers, “The Emergence of Women Composers in Italy,
1566–1700,” in Jane Bowers and Judith Tick , eds., Women Making Music: The Western Art
Tradition, 1150–1950 ( Urbana: University of Illinois Press , 1986), p. 139.
10 John Essex, The Young Ladies’ Conduct: Or Rules for Education ( London, 1722), p. 85.