Www.WorldHistory.Biz
Login *:
Password *:
     Register

 

30-08-2015, 13:21

Huns (Hunni; Hsiung-nu; Xiongnu; Runs)

The Huns were steppe people out of Asia. Although they were defeated by the ROMANS and GERMANICS after an invasion of western Europe, their period of dominance in much of Europe helped bring about the downfall of the Western Roman Empire. Attila the Hun is the most famous leader of all the ancient invaders of Europe.

Origins

The genetic makeup of the Huns is uncertain. A tribe in western China in the second and first centuries B. C.E., who had migrated there from central Asia in the third century B. C.E., the Hsiung-nu or Xiongnu perhaps were the original ancestral Hunnic group (although the name as used by the Chinese may have referred to all nomadic peoples who lived beyond the Great Wall of China, built specifically as a barrier against them). In the first century c. e. pressure from the Chinese or other nomadic peoples caused the people known as Hsiung-nu to migrate both southward and northwestward. The group that headed westward took up residence along the southern reaches of the Ural Mountains and the steppelands north of the Caspian Sea, some of them settling on the Volga River in eastern Europe.

There is considerable evidence of intermingling of peoples and cultures all over the steppe region, both European and Asian, in the Bronze and Iron Ages. Thus the Huns, especially those who migrated to the west, may have been a combination of central Asian Turkic, Mongolic, and Ugric stocks (see Turkics, Mongols, and Finno-Ugrians). Another central Asian group, called the White Huns or Hepthalites or Ephthalites (as known to the Greeks), and Hunas (as known by the Indians), held territory from the Aral Sea to the east, along the eastern border of the Persian Empire, and south into India. It is not certain that they were related to the Huns. As the western Huns advanced into Europe and absorbed other peoples as part of their empire, they began to have Sarmatian and Germanic bloodlines as well.

LANGUAGE

The exact linguistic affiliation of the Huns is not known. They may have spoken Mongolic, Turkic, or Ugric dialects. It eventually included Germanic vocabulary.

History

According to the Chinese historian Ssu-ma Ch’ien in about 176 b. c.e. the Huns defeated the Yueh-chi, known in Europe as the Tocharians, the most eastern-dwelling speakers of an

Huns time line

HUNS

Location:

Eastern and Central Europe

Time period:

Fourth to fifth century c. e. ancestry:

Possibly Mongolian, Turkic, or Ugrian

Language:

Hunnic (possibly Mongolic, Turkic, or Ugric)


B. C. E.

C. 176 Huns defeat Yueh-chi, or Tocharians, in western China, pressuring

Steppe groups known collectively as Sarmatians to expand into present-day Romania and Hungary.

First century Huns move into the southern region of Ural Mountains and along Volga River.

C. E.

370s Huns reach Black Sea and conquer Ostrogoths and other Germanics.

433-434 Attila rules with his brother, Bledu.

445 Attila becomes sole ruler.

451 Huns and allies battle Romans and allies in Gaul.

453 Attila dies; three sons take power.

455 Germanic tribes defeat Attila's sons, and Huns disperse eastward.



Indo-European language, who lived in Xinjiang province, also called Chinese Turkistan. Their growing power caused steppe groups known as Sarmatians to move away from them into Romania and Hungary In the first century b. c.e. possibly under pressure from expansionist China the Huns moved into the southern region of the Ural Mountains and along the Volga River. They thus were part of the age-old phenomenon of the vast Eurasian steppes, the ripple effect caused when a disturbance in one region led to a series of migrations.

Arrival in Europe

In the 370s C. E. the Huns living on the Caspian steppes and Volga River pushed farther westward. In about 372, led by Balamir, they defeated a force of Alans on the banks of the Don River and soon afterward extended their domain to the Black Sea, conquering the Heruli and Goths by 375. They also defeated some of the tribes of Caucasians living north of the Caucasus

Mountains. They pushed on into the Roman province of Dacia (roughly modern Romania), and on the Dniester River defeated the Visigoths, who afterward took refuge in Roman-held lands south of the Danube. The Huns took up residence on the Hungarian plain, settling along the Danube. From here they launched small-scale raids, some clans hiring themselves out as soldiers to the Romans, and engaging in trade with Rome. The Goths were absorbed into the Hunnic confederation as mostly loyal soldiers. Roman influences began to change Hunnic society in fundamental ways. The career of later leaders was in part allowed by these changes, which included a greater degree of social stratification and a need to construct a more ordered society ruled by the more powerful elites who emerged, one of which was Attila’s family

Rugilas, Bleda, and Attila

By about 420 the various Hunnic factions had formed a confederacy under Rugilas and begun

Attila: Empire Builder

Attila (also Etzel or Ethele) was born in about 406 C. E. Little is known of his childhood other than that he was the son of Mundzuk, brother of Bleda, and nephew of Rugilas, on whose death he and his brother became supreme rulers. He also reportedly developed a childhood friendship with Flavius Aetius, who was sent by the Romans as a child hostage to the Hunnic camp and who grew up to be a Roman general.

Attila and Bleda became rivals, and, in about 445 Attila murdered his brother, becoming sole ruler. Attila was an effective leader both militarily and politically, and the Hunnic Empire expanded. The Huns were traditionally master horsemen; Attila adopted some of the techniques of the Romans and developed an extensive infantry as well. He made use of conquered peoples to expand his empire, the Ostrogoths and Heruli among others helping strengthen his army. He also effectively played political angles, allying himself with the Roman emperor’s sister, Honoria, as a basis for a claim of half the Western Roman Empire. He lived modestly as his subjects lived but could demonstrate a sense of appreciation for the fine objects of other cultures when hosting emissaries.

On the battlefield Attila encountered Aetius, his boyhood friend, who made a study of the Huns as Attila himself made a study of the Romans, and lost a critical battle. But the Huns may have in the end proved triumphant over the Roman Empire if Attila had not died in 453, choking from a nosebleed while passed out after a night of celebrating his latest marriage to Ildico.

Attila endured as a larger-than-life historical figure among Western Europeans, referred to as “the Scourge of God.” In later centuries he appeared under the name Etzel in the German epic Nibelungenlied and under the name Atli in the Icelandic Volsungasaga. Although having a reputation as a “barbarian,” Attila was a sophisticated politician who learned much from contacts with Westerners and was more than a match for other European rulers of his day.



This is an artist's rendition of Attila the Hun. (Library of Congress, Prints and Photographs Division [LC-USZ62-87255])


A more aggressive policy of conducting raids for the purpose of plunder. During his rule and that of his nephews (sons of his brother, Mundzuk), Bleda and Attila (see sidebar), who succeeded him in 434, the Hunnic Empire stretched from the Baltic to the Caspian. In 437 the Germanic Burgundii while attempting to expand into Gaul were defeated by the Huns, who probably attacked them with the complicity of the Romans under General Flavius Aetius, who had spent time among the Huns as a boy and had been a friend to Attila. The Burgundian king Gundicar was killed in battle. (This defeat provided the germ of the epic poem Nibelungenlied.) During this period the Huns negotiated an agreement with the Byzantines of the Eastern Roman Empire under Emperor Theodosius ii to stay out of the Balkans. In 441, taking advantage of Roman wars with the Vandals and Persians, the Huns did invade southward. They hoped to take Constantinople (modern istanbul), but the Hunnic army, primarily a cavalry without siege skills, after negotiating for greater tribute withdrew.

Attila’s Invasion of the West

From 433 to 444 Attila united all of the Hunnic tribes under his and his brother’s rule. In about 445 Attila killed Bleda. Meanwhile he had instituted a policy of great annual plundering raids that soon threatened the existence of the Eastern Roman Empire. Attila demanded an annual tribute that amounted to 2,100 pounds of gold a year. In 447-450 the Huns overran the Balkans, entering northern Greece. The new Eastern emperor who rose to power in 450, Marcian, refused to pay further tribute to the Huns, as did Valentinian III, emperor of the West. When Valentinian’s sister, Honoria, tried to forge an alliance with the Huns, Attila claimed this to be a marriage proposal and demanded as her dowry half the Western Empire. Valentinian’s refusal gave Attila political justification to invade Gaul in 451.

The Huns moved through Gaul attacking towns but were forced to give up the siege of Orleans. They took up a position on the Catalaunian Plains south of present-day Chalons-sur-Marne in northeastern France. There they did battle with the Roman army led by Attila’s former friend and ally Flavius Aetius. Fighting alongside the Huns were the Ostrogoths led by three brothers—Thiudemir, Walamir, and Widimir; the Alans; Heruli; Gepids; Marcomanni; Rugii; Sciri; Suebi; and a faction of Franks. Roman allies included the Visigoths under Theodoric i and his son, Thorismond, as well as the Burgundii and a faction of Franks. After bitter fighting the Huns were forced to retreat.

The Huns invaded northern italy the next year and destroyed Aquileia at the head of the Adriatic Sea, whereupon the inhabitants, the Veneti, fled and founded Venice, as well as Milan, Padua, and other cities. At the intercession of Pope Leo i and probably because of a shortage of provisions and a rumored threat of an attack by the Byzantines from the east Attila decided not to attack Ravenna, the capital of the Western Romans at the time, or Rome;

Instead he withdrew and recrossed the Alps. In 453 Attila prepared another invasion of Italy, but he died before carrying out his plan.

After Attila

Ardaric, leader of the Gepids, led a coalition of tribes—among them Heruli, Rugii, Sciri, and Suebi—against Attila’s three sons, Ellak, the oldest, and Dengizik and Ernak. In 455 the allies defeated the Huns in the Battle of Nedao, probably along a tributary of the Sava River in the Roman province of Pannonia (roughly modern Hungary). Ellak was killed. Followers of Dengizik fled eastward to the steppes between the Dnieper and Volga Rivers, where they fused with wandering Turkic-speaking peoples, mostly Ogurs. Followers of Ernak settled southeast of the Sea of Azov with other Turkic tribes. Those who had been Ellak’s followers migrated farther eastward with still other Turkic peoples to territory near the Caspian Sea. Some among the Huns and Turkic peoples evolved into the Bulgars and reentered central Europe in later years. Other Huns meanwhile stayed in Europe and fought as mercenaries in the Roman army.

CULTURE

Economy

The Huns originally were steppe pastoralists who obtained wealth from herding and also raiding. Some Hunnic groups were known to grow wheat, millet, and beans as well. After arriving in Europe they began to engage in trade with the Greco-Roman world on a scale they had not experienced before. The main “products” of the Huns were slaves obtained in their wars, whom they traded to Romans and Greeks for wine, silk, gold, and other goods at fairs held along the Danube River.

Government and Society Settlement Patterns Before the Huns moved out of their traditional territories, they were completely nomadic, living in moving camps rather than towns or cities. The harsh climate of the central Eurasian steppes, with low rainfall and temperature extremes, made suitable grazing lands sparse; summer and winter pasturages were often as much as a thousand miles apart, so that much of the time the Huns were on the move. This lifestyle worked against centralization of authority among the Huns, and their society probably consisted of loose networks of kinship groups ruled by elite warriors whose status was based on their protection of their moving families and the booty they obtained in raids.

The Hunnic Confederation The Huns, similar to Celts, Germanics, and earlier steppe peoples such as the Scythians, were deeply affected both by contact with the Greco-Roman world and by the stresses of migration. The former affected them through the luxury goods that the Hunnic elite sought eagerly: wine, silk, gold, and jewelry made of coral, carnelian, mother-of-pearl, quartz, pyrite, and lapis. Luxury goods fostered greater social stratification as elites acquired the most desirable items, with which they demonstrated their status, and handed lower-status goods to retainers, setting in motion gift-exchange cycles.

The intensification of trade, as well as the challenges of war with such a sophisticated power as Rome, obliged the Huns to develop a more structured way of governing themselves and curb the egalitarian instincts of their war bands. As did the Germanic Goths, who had found it necessary to have an overall war leader to rule their polyethnic coalition, the Huns ceded to Attila more authority than Hunnic leaders had had in the past; for the first time it was he who decided on war and peace for his people. Attila chose a body of advisers from among his nobles (comparable to a political cabinet), who helped him develop a system of collecting food and tribute from his subjects. Even from his camp in Pannonia Attila maintained contact with and control over a vast region. The Huns drew on Sassanid Persian and Roman models in forming their government but retained their own confederate structure based on personal loyalties. (Meanwhile the Hsiung-nu Huns in China were changing their society as well, as attested by the discovery of a city built by them in northwestern China’s Shaanxi Province in the fifth century C. E.)

The ethnic Huns formed the core group of a polyethnic confederation in many ways similar to that of the Goths. This was the reason many Goths became loyal soldiers in the Hunnic confederation, for it meant for the most part merely a change in leadership. This is not to say that the subjection of the Goths and other Germanic groups by the Huns was not harsh to the extreme. Families of the Ostrogoths whom they chose to favor, particularly the Amalis, received fair treatment, but for the rest a mere glance from Attila or one of his nobles was enough to awaken fear and trembling, such was their habitual cruelty, according to later Ostrogothic accounts.

The Huns differed from the Goths in having a more clearly defined structure for their allied groups, based on noble families. Under Attila and his family and the Hunnic families allied with him were specific families of Germanic chiefs—such as the kingly lines of the Gepids and Ostrogoths. The Huns kept control of their Germanic allies by playing different dynasties against one another; even after they accorded the Ostrogothic Amali line rule over all Goths, they encouraged certain other Ostrogothic noble families to maintain their independence as a check on the Amalis. A princely burial uncovered in Hunnic territory in Romania contained a gold sheathed rod (possibly formerly a spear shaft or standard), which is thought to be the token of office borne by noble allies of the Huns. Another sign of alliance with the Hunnic empire was the eagle, fashioned in gold for use as a saddle mount or brooch. Hunnic influence is also shown in the use of a crown or diadem, which the Huns had adopted from Sassanid Persian ritual. The Huns often chose men of humble background to elevate in a new elite loyal only to themselves and not part of earlier Gothic networks of alliance.

Chinese sources state that some Hunnic groups practiced polyandry; two or more brothers shared a wife.

Sources they wore fairly bushy moustaches and no beards except tufts of stiff hair on the chin; their ears were pierced and adorned with rings. They usually shaved their heads, except a tuft on the top.

Religion

The early Huns probably practiced a form of the shamanism observed for millennia by peoples all over the steppe lands. Shamanism usually involved the shaman’s entering a trance state, often attained by ingesting cannabis, to communicate with the spiritual realm and gain wisdom. The Huns worshipped certain mountains as sacred, probably those overlooking their migrations and grazing lands, to whose deities they would pray for rain and protection for the herds. Later other religious impulses moved through the steppe lands—Persian Zoroastrianism, Hinduism, and Buddhism, especially the Tantric sect.

The Huns had the practice, similar to that of the Scythians, of making the skulls of their enemies into drinking cups; this may have had a ritual basis.

The Huns, while they remained an organized group, were adamant in spurning all Christian efforts at converting them.

Military Practices

The Huns fought primarily as mounted bowmen. The quality of their horses, their superb horsemanship and use of horseshoes and stirrups, and the devastating power of their composite bows made them among the most effective troops in the ancient world. Their military structure was loose, consisting of hordes who carried out independent campaigns, maintaining themselves by plundering conquered territories. The Hungarian plain did not offer as much grazing land as did the Asian steppes, and the Huns were forced to develop an infantry to supplement their cavalry.

Clothing

The Huns wore a loose robe to the calf, split at the sides and gathered in by a girdle whose ends hung down in front.

Personal Habits

The Huns practiced the custom, common among steppe nomads, of deforming the skulls of their infants, while they were still soft, into an elongated shape. According to Chinese

The Huns’ arrival in Europe in the late fourth century C. E. led to the displacement and migration of numerous peoples, known in German as the Volkerwanderung (folk wanderings). For all their remote Asian origins, a steppe climate and ecology vastly different from those of Europe, the Huns’ reactions to contact with the Greco-Roman world were remarkably similar to those of many different European peoples— Celts, Germanics, Iberians, Thracians, and others. The Greco-Roman luxury trade and Roman military power transformed all of these peoples, making their societies and economies more complex and creating powerful impulses toward war and domination on a scale not previously known.

Further Reading

Thomas Hodgkin. Huns, Vandals and the Fall of the Roman Empire (London: Greenhill, 1996).

Patrick Howarth. Attila: King of the Huns: The Man and the Myth (New York: Carroll & Graf, 2001). Hugh Kennedy. Mongols, Huns and Vikings (New York: Sterling, 2002).

Otto J. Maenchen-Helfen. The World of the Huns (Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1973).

HUTSULS

Location:

Carpathian Mountains in southwestern Ukraine, extending into northern Romania

Time period:

After fifth century c. e. to present

Ancestry:

Slavic

Language:

Hutsul (East Slavic)


David Nicolle. Attila and the Nomad Hordes: Warfare on the Eurasian Steppes 4th-12th Centuries (Oxford: Osprey, 1990).

Wess Roberts. Victory Secrets of Attila, the Hun (New York: Doubleday, 1993).

Philip W. Steel. In the Shadow of the Hun (Southampton, U. K.: Paul Cave, 1999).

E. A. Thompson. The Huns (Oxford: Blackwell, 1998).

Jack Weatherford. Genghis Khan and the Making of the Modern World (Phoenix, Ariz.: Crown, 2004).



 

html-Link
BB-Link