Www.WorldHistory.Biz
Login *:
Password *:
     Register

 

24-04-2015, 16:13

Amalric of Jerusalem (1136-1174)

King of Jerusalem (1163-1174) and the younger son of Queen Melisende and Fulk of Anjou.

Amalric seems to have been less well educated than his elder brother Baldwin (III), although he had an outstanding grasp of law and history. Baldwin III made him count of Jaffa (mod. Tel Aviv-Yafo, Israel) in 1151; Amalric seems to have lost these lands in 1152 because he sided with Melisende in the civil dispute between king and queen mother. The brothers evidently became friendly again by 1154, for at that time Baldwin III restored Jaffa and also made Amalric count of Ascalon (mod. Tel Ashqelon, Israel). In 1157 Amalric married Agnes of Courtenay, daughter of Count Joscelin II of Edessa. She bore him two children, Sibyl (before 1161) and Baldwin (in 1161). Amalric succeeded to the throne in 1163 when his brother died childless, but the magnates and patriarch of Jerusalem, fearing that Agnes’s family would grow too powerful, insisted that he divorce her before he could be crowned. Amalric agreed to do so on the condition that their children remain legitimate.

The king’s policies aimed at strengthening the Crown legislatively and financially. In judicial matters, his most famous achievement was the Assise sur la ligece, which determined that all fief-holders in the kingdom had to take an oath of homage to the king. Amalric may have hoped to strengthen royal power through these connections with the lower nobility. In fact, after 1198 court decisions based on this assize favored the upper nobility rather than the Crown. The same held true of Amalric’s fiscal ambitions: his campaigns in Egypt, though creatively financed, ultimately ended in military and economic losses.

Fatimid Egypt made a tempting target after Amalric’s accession, owing to its immense wealth and shaky political situation where two viziers vied for control. Nur al-Din, the ruler of Muslim Syria, might intervene there if Jerusalem failed to do so, but equally, he could not allow the Franks to dominate Egypt. In 1163 Nur al-Din sent his general Shirkuh to assist one of the viziers, Shawar, who, however, soon sought military aid against him from Amalric. The king invaded Lower Egypt, and Nur al-Din countered with campaigns against Christian Syria. He captured Prince Bohemund III of Antioch and Count Raymond III of Tripoli while seizing Harenc, Banyas, and parts of the principality of Antioch in 1164. Expeditions in 1167 turned the tables. Nur al-Din sent Shirkuh back to Egypt, which meant that Amalric also had to launch a campaign. The king summoned the High Court but could not convince his nobles to support an attack outside the kingdom. He obtained finance through a 10 percent tax paid by the church and vassals who would not go to Egypt. Shawar greeted the Frankish army with 400,000 dinars in exchange for an alliance. They besieged Alexandria until Shirkuh came to terms, and he and the Franks withdrew from Egypt. Amalric’s agreement with Shawar remained in force: Amalric would offer assistance as long as Shawar paid an annual tribute of 100,000 dinars. The royal treasury benefited from this arrangement, and as long as Amalric remained content with a nominal protectorship over Egypt, Nur al-Din probably would not have reacted.

The king, however, dreamed of conquering Egypt with Byzantine help. In 1167 Amalric cemented his alliance with Manuel I Komnenos by marrying the emperor’s niece, Maria. The following year, Amalric planned a joint assault on Egypt in which the Byzantine fleet would blockade Mediterranean ports while the Franks invaded by land. The king moved too quickly, though, and marched out before the Byzantine navy could provide backup. He could not convince the Templars to join him, despite the inducement of rich lands. Shawar turned to Nur al-Din for help, and Shirkuh returned to Egypt for the last time. Although Amalric won some important victories at first, he could not take Cairo and finally withdrew. Shirkuh then marched in, killed Shawar, and installed himself as vizier. He died two months later, to be succeeded by his nephew Saladin, who quickly built up a strong government in the name of the Fatimids. Amalric marched into Egypt once more in 1168, this time waiting for Byzantine ships to support his attack on Damietta, but withdrew without having received Byzantine support and having gained nothing. Once back in Jerusalem, Amalric patched up his relationship with Manuel Komnenos, culminating in a state visit to Constantinople in 1171.

Saladin was able to topple the Fatimids in 1171, restoring Sunni Islam in Egypt, and Nur al-Din’s death in May 1174 allowed Saladin to move into Syria. The military orders were increasingly acting as free agents within Outremer, negotiating or overturning truces with Islamic powers. Amalric died on 11 July 1174. His heir, Baldwin IV, came to the throne as a minor suffering from leprosy, and Baldwin’s sisters Sibyl and Isabella (Maria’s daughter) became pawns in the hands of rival factions at court.

-Deborah Gerish

Bibliography

Edbury, Peter W., and John G. Rowe, William of Tyre: Historian of the Latin East (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988).

Hamilton, Bernard, “The Titular Nobility of the Latin East: The Case of Agnes of Courtenay,” in Crusade and Settlement, ed. Peter W. Edbury (Cardiff: University College Cardiff Press, 1985), pp. 197-203.

Hiestand, Rudolf, “Die Herren von Sidon und die

Thronfolgekrise des Jahres 1163 im Konigreich Jerusalem,” in Montjoie: Studies in Crusade History in Honour of Hans Eberhard Mayer, ed. Benjamin Z. Kedar, Jonathan Riley-Smith, and Rudolf Hiestand (Aldershot, UK: Variorum, 1997), pp. 77-90.

Lilie, Ralph-Johannes, Byzantium and the Crusader States, 1096-1204 (Oxford: Clarendon, 1993).

Loud, Graham A., “The Assise sur la ligece and Ralph of Tiberias,” in Crusade and Settlement, ed. Peter W. Edbury (Cardiff: University College Cardiff Press, 1985), pp. 404-412.

Lyons, Malcolm C., and D. E. P. Jackson, Saladin: The Politics of Holy War (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982).

Mayer, Hans Eberhard, “The Double County of Jaffa and Ascalon: One Fief or Two?,” in Crusade and Settlement, ed. Peter W. Edbury (Cardiff: University College Cardiff Press, 1985), pp. 181-190.

-, “Die Legitimitat Balduins IV. von Jerusalem und das

Testament der Agnes von Courtenay,” Historisches Jahrbuch 108 (1988), pp. 63-89.

-, “The Beginnings of King Amalric of Jerusalem,” in

The Horns of Hattin, ed. Benjamin Z. Kedar (Jerusalem:

Yad Izhak Ben-Zvi Institute, 1992), pp. 121-135.

Phillips, Jonathan, Defenders of the Holy Land: Relations between the Latin East and the West, 1119-1187 (Oxford: Clarendon, 1996).

Runciman, Steven, “The Visit of King Amalric I to Constantinople in 1171,” in Outremer: Studies in the History of the Crusading Kingdom of Jerusalem, ed. Hans Eberhard Mayer, Benjamin Z. Kedar, and R. C. Smail (Jerusalem: Yad Izhak Ben-Zvi Institute, 1982), pp. 153-158.



 

html-Link
BB-Link