Bibliography

Primary Sources

Abelard Peter (1970) Dialectica, ed. De Rijk LM. Van Gorcum, Assen

Albert of Saxony (1522) Perutilis logica, Venetiis (Repr. Georg Olms, Hildesheim, 1970)

Buridan John (1976) Tractatus de consequentiis, Philosophes medi(?vaux, vol 16, ed. Hubien H. Publications Universitaires, Louvain

Burley Walter (1955) De puritate artis logicae Tractatus longior, with a revised version ofthe Tractatus brevior, Text series, vol 9, ed. Boehner Ph. Franciscan Institute, St. Bonaventure

Ockham William (1974) Summa logicae. Opera philosophica, vol. I. Franciscan Institute, St. Bonaventure

Paul ofPergula (1961) Logica and Tractatus de sensu composito et diviso, Text series, vol 13, ed. Brown MA. Franciscan Institute, St. Bonaventure

Paul of Venice (1472) Logica parva, Venetiis (Repr. Georg Olms, Hildesheim, 1970)

Pseudo-Ockham (1988) Tractatus minor logicae, ed. Buytaert E. In: Ockham William, Opera philosophica, vol VII: Opera dubia et spuria. St. Bouaventure University, St. Bonaventure

Pseudo-Scotus (1639) In librum primum Priorum Analyticorum Aristotelis quaestiones. In: Duns Scotos John, Opera omnia, vol I. Lyon (Repr. Georg Olms Verlag, Hildesheim, 1968)

Strode Ralph (1493) Consequentiae. In: Alexandri Sermonete cum dubiis Pauli Pergulensis necnon Gaetani de Thienis declaratives commentariolus. Venetiis

Von Osma Wilhelm (1991) De consequentiis - IJber die Folgerungen, hrsg. Schupp F, Felix Meiner, Hamburg

Secondary Sources

Ashworth EJ (1974) Language and logic in the post-medieval period. D. Reidel, Dordrecht

Boh I (1982) Consequences. In: Kretzmann Net al (eds) The Cambridge history of later medieval philosophy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 300-314

Boh I (1993) Epistemic logic in the later Middle Ages. Routledge, London

Boh I (2001) Consequence and rules of consequence in the post-Ockham period. In: Yrjonsuuri M (ed) Medieval formal logic. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 147-181

Bos EP (1976) John Buridan and Marsilius ofInghen on consequences. In: Pinborg J (ed) The logic ofJohn Buridan (Opuscula Graecolatina 9). Museum Tusculanum, Copenhagen, pp 61-69

Bottin F (1976) Proposizioni condizionali, ‘‘consequentiae’’ e paradossi dell’implicazione in Paolo Veneto. Medioevo 2:289-330

Dutilh Novaes C (2005) Buridan’s consequentia: consequence and inference within a token-based semantics. Hist Philos Logic 26:277-299

Dutilh Novaes C (2007) Formalizing medieval logical theories: sup-positio, consequentiae and obligationes. Springer, Dordrecht

Gonzales A (1958) The theory of assertoric consequences in Albert of Saxony. Francisc Stud 18:290-354; 19:13-114

Green-Pedersen NJ (1983) Early British treatises on consequences. In: Lewry PO (ed) The rise of British logic (Papers in Mediaeval Studies 7). Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies, Toronto, pp 285-307

Green-Pedersen NJ (1984) The tradition oftopics in the Middle Ages: the commentaries on Aristotle’s and Boethius’ ‘Topics’. Philosophia, Miinchen

King P (2001) Consequence as inference: medieval proof theory 1300-1500. In: Yrj(5nsuuri M (ed) Medieval formal logic. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 117-145

Moody E (1953) Truth and consequence in medieval logic. North-Holland, Amsterdam

Pozzi L (1978) Le Consequentiae nella logica medievale. Liviana Editrice, Padova

Schupp F (1988) Logicalproblems ofthe medievaltheoryofconsequences (History of Logic 6). Bibliopolis, Napoli