In September 1976, Mao Zedong died at the age of
eighty-three. After a short but bitter succession struggle,
the pragmatists led by Deng Xiaoping seized power from
the radicals and brought the Cultural Revolution to an
end. Mao’s widow, Jiang Qing, and three other radicals
(derisively called the “Gang of Four” by their opponents)
were placed on trial and sentenced to death or to long
terms in prison. The egalitarian policies of the previous
decade were reversed, and a new program emphasizing
economic modernization was introduced.
Under the leadership of Deng, who placed his supporters
in key positions throughout the party and the government,
attention focused on what were called the “Four
Modernizations”: industry, agriculture, technology, and
national defense. Deng had been a leader of the faction
that opposed Mao’s program of rapid socialist transformation,
and during the Cultural Revolution, he had been
forced to perform menial labor to “sincerely correct his
errors.” But Deng continued to espouse the pragmatic approach
and reportedly once remarked, “Black cat, white
cat, what does it matter so long as it catches the mice?”
Under the program of Four Modernizations, many of the
restrictions against private activities and profit incentives
were eliminated, and people were encouraged to work
hard to benefit themselves and Chinese society. The familiar
slogan “Serve the people” was replaced by a new
one repugnant to the tenets of Mao Zedong Thought:
“Create wealth for the people.”
Crucial to the program’s success was the government’s
ability to attract foreign technology and capital. For more
than two decades, China had been isolated from technological
advances taking place elsewhere in the world. Although
China’s leaders understandably prided themselves
on their nation’s capacity for “self-reliance,” their isolationist
policy had been exceedingly costly for the national
economy. China’s post-Mao leaders blamed the
country’s backwardness on the “ten lost years” of the Cultural
Revolution, but the “lost years,” at least in technological
terms, extended back to 1949 and in some respects
even before. Now, to make up for lost time, the government
encouraged foreign investment and sent thousands
of students and specialists abroad to study capitalist
techniques.
By adopting this pragmatic approach in the years after
1976, China made great strides in ending its chronic
problems of poverty and underdevelopment. Per capita
income roughly doubled during the 1980s; housing, education,
and sanitation improved; and both agricultural
and industrial output skyrocketed. Clearly, China had begun
to enter the Industrial Age.
But critics, both Chinese and foreign, complained that
Deng Xiaoping’s program had failed to achieve a “fifth
modernization”: democracy. Official sources denied such
charges and spoke proudly of restoring “socialist legality”
by doing away with the arbitrary punishments applied
during the Cultural Revolution. Deng himself encouraged
the Chinese people to speak out against earlier excesses.
In the late 1970s, ordinary citizens began to paste posters
criticizing the abuses of the past on the so-called Democracy
Wall near Tiananmen Square in downtown Beijing.
Yet it soon became clear that the new leaders would
not tolerate any direct criticism of the Communist Party
or of Marxist-Leninist ideology. Dissidents were suppressed,
and some were sentenced to long prison terms.
Among them was the well-known astrophysicist Fang
Lizhi, who spoke out publicly against official corruption
and the continuing influence of Marxist-Leninist concepts
in post-Mao China, telling an audience in Hong
Kong that “China will not be able to modernize if it does
not break the shackles of Maoist and Stalinist-style socialism.”
Fang immediately felt the weight of official displeasure.
He was refused permission to travel abroad, and
articles that he submitted to official periodicals were rejected.
Deng Xiaoping himself reportedly remarked, “We
will not suppress people who hold differing political views
from our own. But as for Fang Lizhi, he has been indulging
in mudslinging and spreading slander without
any basis, and we should take legal action against him.”
Replied Fang, “I have never criticized any Chinese leader
by name, nor accused any of them of illegal acts or immoral
activities. But some perhaps feel guilty. If the cap
fits, wear it.” 5
The problem began to intensify in the late 1980s, as
more Chinese began to study abroad and more information
about Western society reached educated individuals
inside the country. Rising expectations aroused by the
economic improvements of the early 1980s led to increasing
pressure from students and other urban residents
for better living conditions, relaxed restrictions on study
abroad, and increased freedom to select employment after
graduation.