After World War II, the capital of the Western art world
shifted from Paris to New York. Continuing the avantgarde
quest to express reality in new ways, a group of
New York artists known as Abstract Expressionists began
to paint large nonrepresentational canvases in an effort to
express a spiritual essence beyond the material world.
Among the first was Jackson Pollock (1912–1956), who
developed the technique of dripping and flinging paint
onto a canvas spread out on the floor. Pollock’s large
paintings of swirling colors expressed the energy of primal
forces as well as the vast landscapes of his native
Wyoming.
During the 1960s, many American artists began to reject
the emotional style of the previous decade and chose
to deal with familiar objects from everyday experience.
Some feared that art was being drowned out by popular
culture, which bombarded Americans with the images of
mass culture in newspapers, in the movies, or on television.
In the hope of making art more relevant and accessible
to the public, artists sought to pattern their work on
aspects of everyday life to reach and manipulate the
masses. Works such as those by Andy Warhol (1930 –
1987), which repeated images such as soup cans, dollar
bills, and the faces of the Mona Lisa and Marilyn Monroe,
often left the viewer with a detached numbness and a
sense of being trapped in an impersonal, mechanized
world. Repetitious and boring, most such paintings did
little to close the gap between popular culture and serious
art.
Perhaps the most influential American artist of the
postwar era was Robert Rauschenberg (b. 1925), whose
works broke through the distinctions between painting
and other art forms such as sculpture, photography,
dance, and theater. In his “collages” or “combines,”
he juxtaposed disparate images and everyday objects—
photographs, clothing, letters, even dirt and cigarette
butts—to reflect the energy and disorder of the world
around us. He sought to reproduce the stream of images
projected by flicking the channels on a TV set. His works
represented an encapsulated documentary of American
life in the 1960s, filled with news events, celebrities, war,
sports, and advertisements.
Following in Duchamp’s footsteps, Rauschenberg
helped free future artists to find art in anything under the
sun. Beginning in the late 1960s, a new school of conceptual
art began to reject the commercial marketability
of an art object and seek the meaning of art in ideas. Art
as idea could be philosophy, linguistics, mathematics, or
social criticism, existing solely in the mind of the artist
and the audience. In a related attempt to free art from the
shackles of tradition, a school of performance art used the
body as a means of living sculpture. Often discomfiting or
shocking in its intimate revelations, performance art offended
many viewers. Such works expanded the horizons
of modern creativity but also widened the gap between
modern art and the public, many of whom now considered
art as socially dysfunctional and totally lacking in
relevance to their daily lives.
By the early 1970s, Postmodernism became the new
art of revolt. It replaced Modernism, which was no longer
considered sufficiently outrageous. Although some artists
persevered in the Modernist tradition of formal experimentation,
many believed that art should serve society,
and therefore their work expressed political concerns,
seeking to redress social inequities by addressing issues of
gender, race, sexual orientation, ecology, and globalization.
This new style was called conceptual art, because it
was primarily preoccupied with ideas. Using innovative
techniques such as photography, video, and even repre-
sentational painting, such artists (many of them women,
persons of color, gays, or lesbians) produced shocking
works with the intent of motivating the viewer to political
action.
One powerful example of such Postmodern art is found
in the haunting work of the Colombian artist Doris Salcedo
(b. 1959). Her art evokes disturbing images of her
country’s endless civil war and violent drug trade. Salcedo
often presents everyday wooden furniture, over
which she has applied a thin layer of cement and fragments
of personal mementos from the owner’s past life: a
remnant of lace curtain, a lock of hair, or a handkerchief.
Frozen in time, these everyday souvenirs evoke the pain
of those who were dragged from their homes in the
middle of the night and senselessly murdered. Salcedo’s
work can be experienced as an impassioned plea to stop
the killing of innocent civilians or as the fossilized artifact
from some future archaeologist’s dig, showing traces
of our brief and absurd sojourn on earth.
One of the most popular genres in the 1990s was the
installation. The artist “installs” machine- or humanmade
objects, sometimes filling a large room, with the
aim of transporting the viewer to another environment so
as to experience new ideas and self-awareness. A powerful
example is found in the untitled installation of 1997
by Robert Gober (b. 1955), in the center of which a
stereotypical statue of the Virgin Mary stands over an
open drain while a wide steel pipe pierces her body. Such
a violent violation of the Madonna can be viewed by
Christians as the victory and resilience of faith despite
the century’s philosophical discourse denying the existence
of God.
Musical composers also experimented with radically
new concepts. One such innovator was American John
Cage (1912–1992), who by the 1950s had developed the
extreme procedure of “indeterminacy,” or the use of
chance in both musical composition and performance.
Since Cage defined music as the “organization of sound,”
he included all types of noise in his music. Any unconventional
sound was welcomed: electronic buzzers and
whines, tape recordings played at altered speeds, or percussion
from any household item. In wanting to make
music “purposeless,” Cage removed the composer’s control
over the sounds. Rather, he sought to let the sounds,
unconnected to one another, exist on their own. His
most discussed work, called “4 33,” was four minutes
and thirty-three seconds of silence—the “music” being
the sounds the audience heard in the hall during the “performance,”
such as coughing, the rustling of programs,
the hum of air conditioning, and the shuffling of feet.
In the 1960s, minimalism took hold in the United
States. Largely influenced by Indian music, minimalist
composers such as Philip Glass (b. 1937) focus on the
subtle nuances in the continuous repetitions of a melodic
or rhythmic pattern. Yet another musical development
was microtonality, which expands the traditional twelvetone
chromatic scale to include quarter tones and even
smaller intervals. Since the 1960s, there has also been
much experimental electronic and computer music.
However, despite the excitement of such musical exploration,
much of it is considered too cerebral and alien,
even by the educated public.
One of the most accomplished and accessible contemporary
American composers, John Adams (b. 1947), has
labeled much of twentieth-century experimental composition
as the “fussy, difficult music of transition.” His
music blends modernist elements with classical traditions
using much minimalist repetition interspersed with dynamic
rhythms. Critics applaud his opera Nixon in China
(1987), as well as his oratorio El Niño (2000), for their
dramatic effects and haunting music.
Architecture best reflects the extraordinary global
economic expansion of the second half of the twentieth
century, from the rapid postwar reconstruction of Japan
and Europe to the phenomenal prosperity of the West
and the newfound affluence of emerging Third World nations.
No matter where one travels today, from Kuala
Lumpur to Johannesburg, from Buenos Aires to Shanghai,
the world’s cities boast the identical monolithic rectangular
skyscraper, which is the international symbol of
modernization, money, and power.
A major failure of Modernist architecture, inspired by
the utopian schemes of the 1920s and built in the 1960s,
was the creation of a new capital in Brazil. Brasília, a glistening
but sterile city of glass and steel erected as a futuristic
ideal, totally ignored the human factor and as a consequence
has suffered from its impractical limitations. A
more realistic example of city planning is to be found in
Singapore, which since the 1980s has housed 80 percent
of its three million inhabitants in government-built highrise
buildings grouped together in independent communities
called estates. These estates have been adapted to
local conditions on a human scale and include schools,
places of worship, stores, a subway system, day care, and
entertainment.
The arts are affected by the technological discoveries
of their age, and today’s marvel is undoubtedly the computer.
In recent years, all the arts have been grappling
with computerizing their medium. In architecture, for example,
the computer is used as an engineering tool to
solve construction problems for buildings imagined on
the drawing board. What is more, architects today bypass
the drawing board completely and let the computer
conceive the building all by itself. In the visual arts, many
artists compose abstract designs or representational
paintings directly on the computer, forsaking canvas and
brush entirely.
Of all the arts, music has been dealing with electronic
devices the longest, so the computer represents just the
latest technology in composing mathematically formed
atonal works. Computer technology has also invented
“hyperinstruments,” which translate colors or movement
into sounds. The “electric glove,” for example, reacts to
the motion of the fingers, producing changing tones—instant
music.
Not to be undone, “hypertext” fiction offers a thoroughly
postmodern, open-ended text, created by the
reader, who must direct the nonlinear chronology of the
story on the computer. Actually, such a procedure was
first developed during the 1960s by the Argentine author
Julio Cortazar (1914 –1984). In his seminal novel Hopscotch
(1966), the reader selects the chronology of the
story by turning the pages forward or backward. For other
trends in contemporary literature, see the box on p. 211.