Why have global cartels actively poured monies into Project HAARP? Why are these financial activities being masked by Industrial, Governmental, and Military bureaucracies? What covert business arrangement guides the efforts in Gakona? How has the stalemate in OPEC Policies and Petroleum Resources compelled the powerful “outsider cartels” toward new destabilizing ventures on the world stage? What is the “merchandise” which HAARP promises to yield? How have auroral anomalies provided certain cartels with a new power alternative? It is obvious that the DP has been deployed in the northlands to achieve a very specific objective. If it were not so, then the present design which we see would never have been given funding.
The Arecibo facility in Puerto Rico, a geophysically coupled RADAR telescope, could certainly have been outfitted with more powerful radar transmitters than those of which the DP presently boasts. In such a case, Arecibo would have greatly outperformed the intended IRI on several counts. Operating in the superhigh frequency range, the total amount of deliverable energy to the ionosphere would be immense in comparison with the HF energy of even the planned IRI. The enormous parabolic RADAR mirror at Arecibo, built into a natural basin by the Air Force for Cornell University, could most certainly have focussed more heat on the ionosphere than the IRI can ever hope to produce. The Arecibo facility is an 18 acre reflector already in existence. The planned IRI will cover a 33 acre reflective field. But the waves projected by the IRI will be 30 meters, while those at Arecibo are as small as 0.03 meters. The IRI has to be 1000 times the size of Arecibo in order to equate with its effective EM output! Indeed, if we shrank the intended IRI to an equivalent energy-acreage with Arecibo, the IRI would actually measure one six-hundredth the actual size of Arecibo. This is precisely why the IRI requires the intended 1 Gigawatt of HF energy. Balanced out, this energy performs the same ionospheric work as 1.6 Megawatts RADAR frequency energy. So why the expense and the labor?
There is an all important and revealing difference between the two sites.
One which leads direcdy to our conclusion concerning the HAARP Project. Though intensely more powerful than the IRI will ever be, Arecibo does not have the northern access for which the Gakona site has been specifically based. Why north? Why so lose to the geomagnetic pole? Well, what is the stated value of the Project? In the words of the military releases, the DP “stimulates and controls plasma processes" in the northern auroral zone. This is the most clarified comment made by the military press releases, the very one least favored and most understood by the many popular writers on the subject. Examine the evidence. Why is the DP so close to magnetic north? This is the very heart of the HAARP Project, the High Frequency “Active Auroral” Research Program. Why “active auroral”?
Why build so vast a station beneath the auroral ring current? What does Industry want with the Aurora Borealis? Look at the sheer size of the DP. Why the enormous surface area? What has Industry already proven, and what are they hoping to perfect? The history and development of “aerial batteries”, indeed of “earth batteries” as well, is a fascinating and unexpected study. The very first technique used to obtain an energetic flow from the sky to the ground was the very one by which Luigi Galvani first recognized that currents existed in the sky. His elevated copper masts were the very first aerials, the methodic “drawing down” of various energetic currents being attended by a most fascinating series of semi-electrical phenomena. In this regard Dr. Galvani recognized two distinct varieties of current, the one a vitalizing variety; the other, a deadly strain. Before Dr. Franklin ever dreamed of launching forth his famed kite-string-and-key combination. Dr. Galvani had already routinely engaged the several distinct currents with which he was principally fascinated.
Thereafter, the world would seek the mysteries of the skyfire by direct contact through lightning rods and other highly elevated conductors. Aerial terminals of various kinds were tested throughout the latter Eighteenth cind Nineteenth Centuries, a period of intense experimentation with otherwise deadly forces. Dghtning Rod patents flood the patent archives, a magnificent display of remarkable designs whose operative success predicated their receiving official license. Each such design had to prove its effectiveness in protecting against the rogue behaviors of lightning discharges. This meant that the designs had to be tested and witnessed. Heavy wooden blocks were the test mounts for these designs, well placed on the tops of rocky crags. A shower of lightning blasts, and the shrapnel of inferior rods were tossed ciside. Those capable of withstanding the blast were granted patent.
It was later found in these regards that the presence of electricity was not limited to the upper regions of the atmosphere, certainly not to clouds alone, but to every part of the aerial strata immediately above the ground. Therefore many individuals began discovering that power, tremendous power, could be obtained by the use of several different kinds of “collectors”. For this purpose, the inventors of aerial batteries each empirically developed various systems for the methodic accumulation and storage of the “atmospheric current”. In none of these patents do we find the inventors referring to these energetic sources as anything but potent. Indeed, each of the designs were fitted with several lightning arresters. These were used, not so much for the storm conditions which would invariably bring in several accidental lightning bolts, but for the fair weather electrical discharges which appeared with equal and repetitive strength.
The “Electric Apparatus” of H. C. Vion (1860) was stated to be a device for obtaining natural electricity for Industrial Applications. His most powerful embodiments were exceedingly long metallic screens, well insulated from the mountain ridges on which they placed. These screen collectors were interspersed by very tall metallic masts, also well insulated, each sharpened and protruding into the mountain air. The system of Vion brought in a prodigious and dangerous supply of usable current. In his words, the system was an electrical “pile of considerable strength”. A device perfected by W. H. Ward (1872) took the bizarre form of a very large furmel-like turret. Placed atop a very tall peak, and capable of being turned so as “to drive in an aerial current of electricity”. This supply was stored in capacitors and batteries, and used to operate a telegraphic system. M. Dewey (1889) raised a very tall mast, fitted with a large and multi-spiked capacitor hood and drew off sufficient electrical power to run motors and charge storage batteries. Other designs utilized metallic-studded balloons, apparatus capable of bringing in a very powerful surge of current (Palinscar 1901, Pennock 1909).
Experiments with these “passive” designs were gradually moved to very high alpine lands. In addition, it was found that these conditions were most favorably and readily obtained in regions which were as far north as possible. These two requirements, elevation and northern latitude, and the supply of electricity was found to be enormous.
World History
