Abel, D. H. 1962. ‘‘Ariadne and Dido.’’ Classical Bulletin 38: 57-61.
Arkins, B. 1986. ‘‘New Approaches to Virgil.’’ Latomus 45: 33-42.
Arnold, B. 1994. ‘‘The Literary Experience of Vergil’s Fourth Eclogue.’’ Classical Journal 90: 143-60.
Buchheit, V. 1966. ‘‘Vergil in Sorge um Oktavian (zu georg. I, 498 ff.).’’ Rheinisches Museum 109: 78-83.
Clausen, W. 1987. Virgil’s Aeneid and the Traditions of Hellenistic Poetry. Berkeley and Los Angeles.
Clausen, W., ed. 1994. Virgil: Eclogues. Oxford.
Conte, G. B. 1986. The Rhetoric of Imitation: Genre and Poetic Memory in Virgil and Other Latin Poets. Trans. C. Segal. Ithaca, NY.
Crabbe, A. M. 1977. ‘‘Ignoscenda quidem: Catullus 64 and the Fourth Georgic.’’ Classical Quarterly n. s. 27: 342-51.
Edmunds, L. 2001. Intertextuality and the Reading of Roman Poetry. Baltimore.
Farrell, J. 1991. Vergil’s Georgics and the Traditions of Ancient Epic: The Art of Allusion in Literary History. Oxford.
Farrell, J. 1993. ‘‘Allusions, Delusions, and Confusions: A Reply.’’ Electronic Antiquity 1.6. Http://scholar. lib. vt. edu/ejournals/ElAnt/V1N6/farrell. html.
Farrell, J. 1997. ‘‘The Virgilian Intertext.’’ In C. Martindale, ed., The Cambridge Companion to Virgil. Cambridge. 222-38.
Ferguson, J. 1971-2. ‘‘Catullus and Virgil.’’ Proceedings of the Virgil Society 11: 25-47.
Fitzgerald, W. 1995. Catullan Provocations: Lyric Poetry and the Drama of Position. Berkeley, Los Angeles, and London.
Glenn, J. 1974. ‘‘The Blinded Cyclops: lumen ademptum (Aen. 3.658).’’ Classical Philology 69: 37-8.
Gonnelli, G. 1962. ‘‘Presenza di Catullo in Virgilio.’’ Giornale italiano difilologia 15: 225-53.
Griffith, R. D. 1995. ‘‘Catullus’ Coma Berenices and Aeneas’ Farewell to Dido.’’ Transactions of the American Philological Association 125: 47-60.
Heath, M. 2002. Interpreting Classical Texts. London.
Hinds, S. 1998. Allusion and Intertext: Dynamics of Appropriation in Latin Poetry. Cambridge.
Holzberg, N. 2004. ‘‘Impersonating the Young Vergil: The Author of the Catalepton and His Libellus.’’ Materiali e discussioni 52: 29-40.
Hubbard, T. K. 1998. The Pipes of Pan: Intertextuality and Literary Filiation in the Pastoral Tradition. Ann Arbor, MI.
Jenkyns, R. 1998. Virgil’s Experience: Nature and History: Times, Names, and Places. Oxford.
Johnson, W. R. 1976. Darkness Visible: A Study of Vergil’s Aeneid. Berkeley and Los Angeles.
Johnston, P. 1987. ‘‘Dido, Berenice, and Arsinoe: Aeneid 6.460.’’ American Journal of Philology 108: 649-54.
Kilroy, G. 1969. ‘‘The Dido Episode and the Sixty-Fourth Poem of Catullus.’’ Symbolae Osloenses 44: 48-60.
Knight, W. S. J. 1944. Roman Vergil. 2nd edn. London.
Konstan, D. 2000/2. ‘‘Self, Sex, and Empire in Catullus: The Construction of a Decentered Identity.’’ In V. Becares Botas, F. Pordomingo, R. Cortes Tovar, and C. Fernandez Corte, eds., La intertextualidadgriega y latina. Madrid. 213-31. (Also available online at http:// zeno. stoa. org/cgi - bin/ptext? doc=Stoa:text:2002.01.0005.)
Lefe:vre, E. 2000b. ‘‘Catullus Parzenlied und Vergils vierte Ekloge.’’ Philologus 144: 62-80.
Lyne, R. O. A. M. 1994. ‘‘Vergil’s Aeneid: Subversion by Intertextuality, Catullus 66.39-40 and Other Examples.’’ Greece & Rome 41: 187-204.
Marincic, M. 2001. ‘‘Der Weltaltermythos in Catulls Peleus-Epos (C. 64), der kleine Herakles (Theokr. ID. 24) und der romische ‘Messianismus’ Vergils.’’ Hermes 120: 484-504.
Mendell, C. W. 1951. ‘‘The Influence of the Epyllion on the Aeneid.’’ Yale Classical Studies 12: 205-26.
Mynors, R. A. B., ed. 1958 (rev. 1960). C. Valerii Catulli Carmina recognovit brevique adnotatione critica instruxit. Oxford.
Mynors, R. A. B., ed. 1969. P. Vergili Maronis opera. Oxford.
Newman, J. K. 1990. Roman Catullus and the Modification of the Alexandrian Sensibility. Hildesheim.
O’Sullivan, N. 1993. ‘‘Allusions of Grandeur? Thoughts on Allusion-Hunting in Latin Poetry.’’ Electronic Antiquity 1.5. Http://scholar. lib .vt. edu/ejournals/EIAnt/V1N 5/osullivan. html.
Otis, B. 1964. Virgil: A Study in Civilized Poetry. Oxford.
Perutelli, A. 1980. ‘‘L’episodio di Aristeo nelle Georgiche: struttura e tecnica narrativa.’’ Materiali e discussioni 4: 59-76.
Petrini, M. 1997. The Child and the Hero: Coming of Age in Catullus and Vergil. Ann Arbor, MI.
Putnam, M. C. J. 1970. Virgil’s Pastoral Art: Studies in the Eclogues. Princeton, NJ.
Putnam, M. C. J. 1989. ‘‘Catullus 11 and Virgil Aen. 6.786-7.’’ Vergilius 35: 28-30.
Putnam, M. C. J. 1995-6. ‘‘The Lyric Genius of the Aeneid.’’ Arion 3.2-3: 81-101.
Putnam, M. C. J. 1998. Virgil’s Epic Designs: Ekphrasis in the Aeneid. New Haven, CT.
Quinn, K. 1968. Virgil’s Aeneid: A Critical Description. Ann Arbor, MI.
Rand, E. K. 1906. ‘‘Catullus and the Augustans.’’ Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 17: 15-30.
Ross, D. O., Jr. 1975. Backgrounds to Augustan Poetry: Gallus, Elegy, and Rome. Cambridge.
Schmiel, R. 1979. ‘‘AVirgilian Formula.’’ Vergilius 25: 37-40.
Simpson, F. P., ed. 1879. Select Poems of Catullus. London.
Skinner, M. B. 2003. Catullus in Verona: A Reading of the Elegiac Libellus, Poems 65-116. Columbus, OH.
Skulsky, S. 1985. ‘‘‘Inuitus, regina...’: Aeneas and the Love of Rome.’’ American Journal of Philology 106.4: 447-55.
Slater, D. A. 1912. ‘‘Was the Fourth Eclogue Written to Celebrate the Marriage of Octavia to Mark Antony? A Literary Parallel.’’ Classical Review 26.4: 114-19.
Smith, R. A. 1993. ‘‘A Lock and a Promise: Myth and Allusion in Aeneas’ Farewell to Dido in Aeneid 6.’’ Phoenix 47: 305-12.
Tatum, J. 1984. ‘‘Allusion and Interpretation in Aeneid 6.440-76.’’ American Journal of Philology 105.4:434-52.
Thomas, R. F. 1982. ‘‘Catullus and the Polemics of Poetic Reference (Poem 64.1-18).’’ American Journal of Philology 103: 144-64.
Thomas, R. F. 1986. ‘‘Virgil’s Georgies and the Art of Reference.’’ Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 90: 171-98.
Thomas, R. F., ed. 1988. Virgil: Georgies. 2 vols. Cambridge.
Thomas, R. F. 1999. Reading Virgil and His Texts: Studies in Tntertextuality. Ann Arbor, MI. Tracy, S. V. 1977. ‘‘Catullan Echoes in Aeneid 6.333-36.’’ American Journal of Philology 98: 20-3.
Van Sickle, J. 1992. Virgil’s Messianic Eclogue. New York.
Westendorp-Boerma, R. E. H. 1958. ‘‘Vergil’s Debt to Catullus.’’ Acta Classica 1: 51-63. Wigodsky, M. 1972. Vergil and Early Latin Poetry. Wiesbaden.
Wilkinson, L. P. 1969. The Georgics of Virgil: A Critical Survey. Cambridge.
Wills, J. 1996. Repetition in Latin Poetry: Figures of Allusion. Oxford.
Wills, J. 1998. ‘‘Divided Allusion: Virgil and the Coma Berenices.’’ Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 98: 277-305.
Zarker, J. W. 1967. ‘‘Aeneas and Theseus in Aeneid 6.’’ Classical Journal 62.5: 220-6.
A Companion to Catullus Edited by Marilyn B. Skinner Copyright © 2007 by Blackwell Publishing Ltd
World History
