Www.WorldHistory.Biz
Login *:
Password *:
     Register

 

21-05-2015, 02:50

Overview

As the Formative Period began the climate became progressively wetter (and perhaps warmer), the lake level rose, and the grasslands increased, making the Titicaca basin more hospitable and arable (Figure 28.2). Archaeologists are uncovering sites that have early dates, especially on the west lakeshore (Cipolla 2005).

Ritual, political, and economic changes throughout the Formative sequence are seen in settlement patterns, architectural layout, ceremonialism, feasting evidence, lithics, carved stone imagery, ceramics, and plant and animal use. Particularly notable changes are seen in the major shifts in emphasis of mood and iconographic image on stone and ceramics, associated with the shifts in architectural constructions. These are the elements that define the sub-phases in the region. The images are not literal but symbolic. Early stone images suggest agricultural renewal and fertility, having links to water and growth in today’s alti-plano symbolic world. These early agricultural fertility images are what Browman (1972) describes as the Asiruni images of the snake, lizard, and frog. Social-political change and polities are evident in the increased ritual elaboration in the architectural complexes and diverse media. The material evidence of increasing integration means that there were more people on the landscape and also that there were a series of new and different forms of interaction. These cultural forms included more regular farming and herding, long distance trade, increasing territoriality and self identification of group, memorializing ancestors

Figure 28.2. The shore surrounding modern Lake Titicaca (photo by William T. Whitehead)

Through communal ceremonies that included food, drink, music, smoke, and processions. Subsistence was still a healthy mix of camelid husbandry, fishing, and a range of foraging including increasingly intensive tuber and Chenopodium collection, eventually slipping into farming by the Late Formative (Bruno and Whitehead 2003).

Early Formative

The Early Formative (1500-800 BC) is marked by ephemeral domestic structures that are rarely visible archaeologically. However, at small settlements along the shore of Lake Titicaca there is the first permanent architecture in the region in the form of surface-level and sunken enclosures (Hastorf 1999). This is the first civic architecture in the Titicaca basin. Early ceremonial enclaves are oriented towards the high mountain peaks (Leonardo Benetiz, personal communication, 2005).

From excavation, there is evidence of prepared surfaces within mud-brick walls over 10 m in length at a few sites. These early sites are found along the lakeshore, overlooking the lake. Settlements were autonomous, however there was surely regular communication between neighbors.

Chiripa has been more intensively studied for this time period and thus will be more reported on here (Bennett 1936; Browman 1978, 1980; Chavez 1988; Hastorf 1999; Kidder 1956; Mohr 1966; Ponce1970; Portugal Ortiz 1992). In Early Formative I (1500-1000 BC) on the lowest of three hillside terraces there is an extensive plastered surface within an adobe walled enclosure, containing multiple burial pits. The burial pits that the Taraco Archaeological Project has opened contain multiple burials, with additional individuals deposited with adult females (Dean and Kojan 2001; Steadman and Hastorf 2001; Hastorf 2003; Eduardo Machicado, personal communication, 2007).

There is more evidence for the next sub-phase, the Early Formative II (Middle Chiripa, 1000-800 BC). The differences between the northern basin and the southern basin are reflected in the artifacts, lithics, ceramics and trade items (this would change only with the post-Formative Tiwanaku IV phase, after AD 500) (Amanda Cohen, personal communication, 2006).

Around 1000 BC the first sunken enclosures were built at the larger settlements, becoming more common later in the Middle Formative Period(see below). They are sunken because they were excavated into the earth, and then supported with rock walls that are plastered and painted, blending into the landscape with a modest impact on sightlines. These enclosures gave some privacy to people participating in events within them, although onlookers could gain a good vantage from the surrounding banks. Their early significance is still much discussed, especially as the earth (Pachamama) has long been seen as the source of life in the Andes. This sunken enclosure tradition was a powerful and important form of ritually marking sacred space and territory, allowing varying sizes of groups to “meet” with the ancestors. As such, sunken enclosures are still used today by communities, as seen on the island of Amantani in Lake Titicaca (Niles 1987b; Spahni 1971). Such continuities in the Titicaca basin support assumptions about the importance of chthonic power, fertility, and land claims through ancestral propitiation. These semisubterranean edifices were built until 100 BC. There is one such enclosure recorded at Chiripa, dating to the Early Formative II phase (Choquehuanca), located on the first terrace above the lake. These trapezoidal sunken enclosures measure around 14 m x 11 m, widening eastward (Whitehead 1999; Hastorf 1999, 2003). Most of these date to the following phase.

Middle Formative

The Middle Formative (800-250 BC) is when we see clusters of settlements for the first time. There are at least eight documented regional settlement clusters around the lake with civic-ceremonial architecture dating to this phase. The ceremonial architecture consists of stepped platform mounds, often in conjunction with the sunken enclosures. Stanish (1994) speaks of a Middle Formative Sunken Court Tradition because each of the larger sites in this time period has a sunken court, later placed next to raised platform mounds.

The site clusters suggest discrete self-identifying polities, visible archaeologically with their centrifugal placement, architecture, artifact types and iconography. The political world is comprised of loosely woven, ritually driven lineage alliances, covering the landscape in sedentary settlements, ceremonial centers, alignments and agricultural fields. The architecture suggests a focus on chthonic rituals, with the ceremonies gravitating around special burials. These ceremonial places are usually oriented towards mountain peaks, the font of water and where the ancestors dwell.

The Middle Formative is most clearly identified with sites like Chiripa, Incatunuhu-iri, Qaluyu, Ch’isi, and Sillumocco-Huaquina. These Titicaca centers were located in the most temperate climatic zones of the region along the lakeshore, often oriented to the mountain peaks. Qaluyu is an exception, located inland along the Pukara River (Figure 28.1). These settlements grew in local influence with increased exchange and political competition through this time period.

The Late Chiripa phase, also called the Middle Formative (800-250 BC), has yielded more ceremonial construction. The archaeological data inform us that these were a dynamic and exciting 500 years in the basin. The lake rose at the beginning of this phase, providing lush marshes around the shoreline. Then in late Middle Formative times, the lake level dropped, expanding the pampa, providing more grazing land—if less accessible fishing. During this time settlement clusters became ubiquitous around the basin (Stanish 2003; Hastorf 2005). While there are basin-wide similarities, each center displays slightly different stylistic features, most clearly seen in the recent detailed ceramic studies by Steadman at Camata (1995) and Chiripa (1999) and the new material from Incatunuhuiri (Frye and Steadman 2001). From this research, we learn that these lakeshore groups developed their own ceramic traditions, although the northern clusters were influenced by Qaluyu/Pukara styles and the southern settlements by the Chiripa/Taraco Peninsula styles.

The populations were denser in areas that are slightly more protected and warmer, such as the Santiago de Huatta Peninsula and the Taraco Peninsula. It is possible that these different alliance groups spoke different languages or dialects, for there is historic and ethnographic evidence that there were many more languages spoken around the lake in the past than there are today (Denise Arnold, personal communication, 1999; today Aymara predominates; there are pockets of Quechua speakers in the north, brought in by the Incas; the almost nonexistent Pukina language is found to the east).

Albarracin-Jordan has constructed a plausible model for local political development in the Tiwanaku Valley (1996). He proposes a form of nested kin-based ayllus, distributed across the landscape, that developed through interactive influence during the Middle and Late Formative (see also Platt 1986). Political leadership structures are inferred, but some form of economic accumulation via kin-based ayllu consolidation (families linked to territory emotionally, physically, and corporeally) grew over these 500 years. As these self-identities developed and consolidated, built upon fertility imagery, memorialization of ancestors and stone carvings with surreal imagery (Figure 28.3), it appears that interest in

Figure 28.3. Middle Formative carved stone in the Pa’Ajano/Yaya Mama style. (Christine Hastorf)

Exotic items also increased, entering both from the west coast, the northern and southern mines, as well as from the eastern forests. These items included sodalite beads, copper, arsenical bronze, salt, and warm valley plants (trees, ritually used plants and medicines). Both Browman and Stanish have suggested that the engine for this political centralization was through extra-basin trade (Browman 1984; Stanish 2002). Bandy and Hastorf, on the other hand, see such increased communication as a reflection of relative peace and productivity throughout the basin, allowing for developing and elaborating ceremonies that brought people together throughout the annual cycle. Such movements around the basin, including pilgrimages to the centers, would naturally evolve into trips farther afield, seeking new ways to honor the dead (such as with Spondylus, vilca [Anadenanthera colubrina] and coca [Erythroxylum coca Lam.]).

When Wendell C. Bennett published his survey of Lake Titicaca basin archaeology in 1950, he mentioned six sites, five of which were phased in the Formative by diagnostic

Pottery. While today over a dozen sites with sunken enclosures potentially dating to this phase have been investigated, there should be many more as yet unreported sites, especially circling the larger centers. A Middle Formative center is defined as a site with a sunken enclosure that also may have a raised platform mound. These centers hug the lakeshore and often have a view of the magnificent snow-peaked mountain ranges, still important deities today. At least by the end of this phase, the larger sites were regularly spaced around the lakeshore in more densely populated regions like the Taraco, Copacabana, and the Huatta peninsulas in the south as well as along larger rivers like the Pukara and the Ilave to the north. Surveys have documented the distribution of these centers about every 6 km, with smaller settlements in between, as shown in the work of Charles Stanish (1997) and Clark Erickson (1996) on the western and northern shore, Eduardo Casanova (1942), Karen and Sergio Chavez (1997) on the Copacabana Peninsula, Carlos Lemuz (2001) and Jose Luis Paz Soria in the Santiago de Huatta Peninsula-Achacachi area, and Matthew Bandy (2001) on the Taraco Peninsula. In fact, it is quite clear from these more systematic surveys that there are quite dense settlements by this Middle Formative time. Albarracin-Jordan and Mathews (1990) discovered clusters of sites (about four sites per cluster) dating to this time period in the Tiwanaku Valley, containing ceramics similar to Chiripa, some 10 km away. These archaeologists suggest that these settlements housed related kin ayllus. In fact, Mathews (1995) has suggested that some of these Tiwanaku Valley clusters are outposts of a Chiripa “chiefdom.” We know, now, that another Taraco Peninsula site, Kala Uyuni was more likely to have been Tiwanaku’s early competitor (Bandy and Hastorf 2007).

Chiripa has been the center most often identified with this time period. While we now know about other settlements, Chiripa continues to stand out, in large part because of the extent of archaeological work that has been completed there. Bandy’s (2001) survey, however, has turned up three other contemporaneous sites from this time period on the Taraco Peninsula, suggesting that Chiripa was one of a set of regularly spaced centers on the peninsula in this phase. Numerous names have been used for this socio-religious development in the southern basin: Classic Chiripa (Bennett 1936), the Lower and Upper House levels (Kidder 1956), Mamani (Browman 1978a, 1980, 1981), and Late Chiripa (K. Chavez 1988; Mohr 1966; Hastorf 1999b; Hastorf et al. 1997). This Late Chiripa Phase is further subdivided, based on architectural elaboration and absolute dating. At Chiripa, a series of enclosures were built upon the three terraces up the hillside (e. g. Quispe and Llusco). These trapezoidal enclosures measure approximately 13 m x 11 m, each having a drainage canal (Hastorf 1999; Hastorf et al. 1997; Paz Soria 1999). In addition to these early sunken courts at Chiripa, an elevated platform mound was renewed continuously on the middle terrace throughout the Formative Period. The mound began as a ground level enclosure in the Early Chiripa phase. Then, during early Late Chiripa times, a number of 3 m x 4 m structures were built on a low terrace, probably placed around a central enclosure. Periodically these floors were burnt. After a sequence of ritual closures and rebuilding events, the populace altered the architectural style and built fourteen coordinated rectangular structures that symmetrically encircle a sunken enclosure on a higher platform mound (Figure 28.4). These structures were not rebuilt but were used for ritual storage and small ceremonies for several centuries until around 250 BC (Hastorf 2003). After these structures were burnt and their walls pushed inward, the platform was filled in and a series of three yellow surfaces were laid down encircling the sunken court. Recent ceramic analysis from these fills and floors on the mound tells us that this sequence occurred in the Late Chiripa phase (Steadman personal communication 2007). Chiripa seemed to lose its ritual influence by the end of the Formative time, as the pull of Tiwanaku grew.

C. A. Hastorf too. OO

Figure 28.4. Map of Middle Formative structures at Chiripa. (William T. Whitehead)


Turning to the northern basin, Qaluyu flourishes and expands, with architecture shaped in the form of animals, (S. Chavez 1992; Kidder 1956). Clark Erickson (personal communication, 1999) has reported Formative materials from the site of Pancha, on the northwest shore of the lake. This large site has a stone-lined platform mound. It is geographically associated with raised fields. It has absolute dates ranging between 800 and 600 BC. There are iconographic influences from the south (Chiripa) in the northern settlements during this time, as well as from the western coast. These stylistic influences are exhibited in the lower levels of Pukara and Qaluyu (Cohen 2001). Slightly south of Qaluyu, these sites encompass the beginning of the Cusipata phase at Pukara (K. Chavez 1977). The Cusipata phase (500 to 20 BC) witnessed the first clear civic building at Pukara (S. Chavez

1992; Mujica 1987; Wheeler and Mujica 1981:26-29). The sacred region at Pukara contains Qaluyu and Cusipata pottery, discovered first in the sunken enclosures (Wheeler and Mujica 1981; K. Chavez 1977). Pukara continues on into the late Formative with increased elaboration.

During the Middle Formative and Late Formative I times, the figures cut into stone tend to be anthropomorphic, focused on human heads or whole bodies, often with two sexes on the same stone, heads at either end of the body or four appendages emanating out of one head, again symbolic for associated energies. These styles were categorized by Karen and Sergio Chavez with the Quechua term, “Yaya-Mama” (K. Chavez 1988;

S. Chavez and K. Chavez 1975); Portugal Ortiz used the Aymara term “Pa’Ajano” (1981) as did Browman writing “Pajano” (1972, but also see Browman 1995). These terms refer to the more elaborate back-to-back carved stone figures of male and female images. This group of images imbues a sense of organic union, fertility and ancestral ties, with more emphasis on humans than in the earlier images, albeit continuing on in a surreal manner. These images have been found within sunken enclosures and also in the later, Formative stepped platforms (Stanish 2003).

Based on their research on the Copacabana Peninsula, Karen and Sergio Chavez suggest that domestic houses were removed slightly from the sacred ritual core, in addition to occurring at small farmstead settlements. They uncovered oval semi-subterranean stone structures of about 8 m x 5 m on a terrace about 100 m from the Ch’isi semi-subterranean enclosure, dating to 220 BC, at the end of this Middle Formative phase. While we are unclear about the full range of activities that transpired in the domestic areas at this time, due to little in situ excavation of domestic life, there is evidence of food preparation and storage. The domestic rubbish pits that the Taraco Archaeological Project has excavated show a different assemblage than those associated with the ritual areas. The domestic pits are filled with fish, bones, charred remains, and many large and undecorated cooking pots. The ceremonial rubbish includes more painted pottery and fewer cooking pots (Steadman 2002). Food evidence tells us that these populations were supporting themselves on local produce and even increasing their production to host feasts that aided the more intensive social interactions that were developing.

At this time, the southern sites tend to have more painted wares than do the northern sites. If painted wares reflect ceremonial/sacred/ public activities, then the presence of such painted wares supports the thesis of earlier escalation of ceremonialism in the southern basin and on the Taraco Peninsula in particular. Although we cannot determine who controlled these feasts and ceremonies yet, we are learning more about where such events might have taken place and what they entailed.

Late Formative (Tiwanaku I/III)

The Late Formative (250 BC-AD 475) (Tiwanaku I/III, also called the Qalasasaya and Qeya phases) begins with a scalar change in centrifugal influence. Not only did the centers continue to flourish as independent but interactive entities (this is best illustrated by their divergent artifact styles: see Steadman 1995; Bandy 2003; Stanish 2003), but the local populace gravitationally turned their attention to larger centers, as least ceremonially; there is a consolidation of larger, multiple-community ceremonial centers. These centers gained stylistic influence not only over the smaller centers and their populace, but clearly began to produce ever more elaborate performances for the visitors with increasingly more powerful imagery and ritual paraphernalia.

The Late Formative is divided into two sub-phases, I and II (Table 28.1). The Late Formative I (250 BC-AD 300) saw the rise and collapse of the northern center, Pukara, the coalescing of the western Sillumocco sphere (also called the Moyopampa Complex; de la Vega 2005), the Taraco Peninsula centralized at Kala Uyuni and Sonaje (Bandy et al. 2004; Hastorf et al. 2005), the Santiago de Huatta Peninsula becoming one entity (Lemuz 2001), and the coalescence of the southwestern altiplano center Khonko Wankane, in addition to the rise of other polities around the lake shore. The most prominent of these centrifugal trajectories however was the expansion of Tiwanaku as the major center in the southern basin.

In Late Formative I, long-distance trade became more prevalent, reflected by the artifact styles that were more broadly distributed. In addition to the intensification of trade in the Late Formative I, agriculture and herd production also intensified.

Within Late Formative I, between 250-100 BC, political and social change escalated throughout the basin. The climate was warming and getting wetter, the lake was rising again, although it had been changeable throughout the Middle Formative as well. Ceremonial settlements grew in size and architectural sophistication. Community engagement was more materially manifest, with certain centers having increasingly elaborate architecture. These material energies were channeled to impress locals and surrounding visitors through refurbishing and building larger stepped platforms, covered with cut stone and containing elaborate chambers for storing goods and ancestors. Pottery (and probably weavings) was more elaborately made, with new imagery that was circulated around the southern Andes. The imagery was more overtly powerful, with “power over” dominating the “power to” imagery. The ceramic assemblage was more complex; with new forms of braziers, serving bowls and cups suggesting more concern with feasting and presentation. Central in this elaboration of presentation and place was the dominance of Pukara, located off the northern lakeshore. This zone, rich in herding pasture-land, clearly was in intensive contact with the north, into the Canis and Canchis ethnic area, on up to the Peruvian north coast (Cupisnique) as well as to the west and the Paracas Peninsula and the Ica and Nazca valleys. Its size, images and architecture place Pukara at the center of all settlements in the northern basin.

The development of a large Pukara polity is based on the increased elaboration of the stepped platforms, built up the hillside, with multiple sunken enclosures on the top (Figure 28.5; K. Chavez 1988; Klarich 2004). Accompanying this larger ceremonial form was a shift to this “power over” imagery, with the new dominance of disarticulated human heads, bodies, males with knives and front-faced deities (S. Chavez 2002). Yet accompanying this aggressive image is one of fecund power, seen in front faced women holding flowers and camelids. These new images suggest an increased emphasis on status differentiation, ritual elaboration, esoteric knowledge, power over others, and identity building (Helms 1979, 1998). While we, as yet, have not documented specific images with specific trade routes, ongoing research should inform us of such regular interaction. It is hoped that the sources of stone hoes, food plants, wood, and hallucinogenic plants will clarify these trade routes, including those to the east.

These Pukara images, found on ceramics and carved stone, incorporated the powerful images of a shamanistic religious cult that is generally associated with the acquisi-tional power gained from dead enemies, most notably seen in trophy head images on the south coast (Proulx 1999, 2001; Silverman and Proulx 2002; S. Chavez 2002; Arnold and Hastorf 2008). While heads had been included in the earlier Pa’Ajano images, in the Middle Formative times illustrated in Figure 28.3, they took on a more ominous and overly powerful dimension, as the heads were now held by kneeling feline masked humans (chachapuma images), suggesting a strong sense of unequal power over others, or at least increasingly

Figure 28.5. View of Pukara platform, whose high retaining walls run the length of most of the picture, but have been exposed by excavation in the center only. (photo by William H. Isbell)

Powerful ritual specialists. These images, as well as the carved heads found in niches at Pukara (Mujica and Wheeler 1981), suggest that the ritual leaders were continuing to focus on ancestor veneration as a lynchpin to community formation.

It is increasingly clear that Tiwanaku, off the southern shore of Lake Titicaca, was also actively building more elaborate ceremonial edifices. The site was not located up against hills, but rather built on a flat plain. The Tiwanaku inhabitants early on built an elaborate semi-subterranean enclosure, with many carved tenon heads embedded in its four walls (Figure 28.6; Ponce Sangines 1990). Recent scholars have written on this topic, suggesting that these heads, perhaps like those found at Pukara, represented local ancestral leaders, brought together into the greater alliance of the expanding center (Hastorf 2003; Couture 2004). These heads are naturalistic and diverse suggesting a range of different people [Note 2]. Thus, Tiwanaku and Pukara were both escalating their regional influence through pomp and circumstance, ceremony and feasting, harkening back to the power of the venerable dead. Tiwanaku residents later also joined the basins civil ceremonial forms with a human made mountain seen in the Akapana stepped mound.

This trajectory peaked during the last 400 years of the Late Formative period (AD 100-475), with several central sites gaining prominence over broader areas during this time. In the northern Titicaca basin the site of Pukara had regular trading ties to the Nazca and Cuzco valleys (Valcarcel 1935; Rowe and Brandel 1969; Mujica 1978, 1987; Wheeler and Mujica 1981; Conklin 1983; S. Chavez 2002). In the southern basin, Tiwanaku (Tiwanaku I phase) superseded earlier centers, such as Chiripa, Kala Uyuni, Khonko Wankane and Santiago de Huatta. By AD 300 Tiwanaku had become an active trading center to the south into the Chilean coastal area (San Pedro de Atacama) (Rivera 1991; Rodman 1992), perhaps shifting the balance of trade routes southward out of the basin from the previous phase, which was oriented more to the north (Stanish 2003).

Figure 28.6. Partial view of the semi-subterranean enclosure at Tiwanaku showing tenoned heads. (Christine Hastorf)

This brings us to the Late Formative II phase (AD 300-475). These years witnessed Tiwanaku becoming a more formal ritual and political center as its residents began exercising more influence not only in the south but also in the northern lake basin. With this new level of integration came a reformulation of ceremonialism, and an ever increasingly formal ceremonial core. Tiwanaku’s new buildings were oriented towards the sun’s movements now, no longer towards the mountains and the moon (Leonardo Benetiz personal communication, 2005).

In the Qalasasaya phase and on into the Qeya times (AD 300-475), we begin to see evidence for more overt political authority, with controlling civic cults built upon the earlier religious foundations of incorporation and kin-group ancestor worship. This authority is reflected in the architecture at the centers, but mushroomed most at Tiwanaku. There is evidence for the intensification of several economic strategies throughout the Late Formative phase, including intensive pampa agriculture, a strong lacustrine economy of gathering, fishing, and herding (Erickson 1988, 1996; Graffam 1990). Once the lake stabilized, sometime around AD 200, and the hydrology was steady (Binford and Kolata 1996; Abbott, et al. 1997), a series of intensive economic strategies were developed, including raised fields, qochas (bofedales, artificially enlarged seasonal ponds used to feed and water camelids; Flores Ochoa 1987), and aqueducts that channeled hillside water for erosion control and irrigation.

It is during this time that Pukara waned, losing its trajectory of ceremonial building (Klarich 2004). Now, Tiwanaku was the largest center, with ever increasing influence

Across not only the southern basin but also the northern region. Tiwanaku was not alone, however, as a range of well endowed centers existed to the north and south of Tiwanaku, with elaborate images in the Tiwanaku style (Bermann 1994; John Janusek, personal communication, 2005).

Domestic architecture continues to be rarely uncovered in the basin, due to a research focus on large architecture and the fact that these structures are ephemeral. Bermann’s (1994) work at Lukurmata is an exception, where he uncovered rectangular houses. In 2005, John Janusek’s team exposed a sequence of small circular structures at Khonko Wankane, providing us with a set of domestic houses (John Janusek, personal communication, 2005). These small structures contrast with the large enclosure that has also been uncovered over the past few years of work there, associated with very elaborate and large carved stone stelae. The Taraco Archaeological Project also has recently found one, round domestic structure at Kala Uyuni dating to this time period, approximately 4 m wide. These structures all provide evidence of food preparation and storage.

The Formative Period in the Titicaca basin culminates with the cultural development of the large-scale highland Tiwanaku polity with the extension of Tiwanaku’s influence outside the Titicaca basin. This entity expanded throughout the south-central region between AD 475 and 500. By the end of the Formative, Tiwanaku dominated the region, culminating in its regional influence.



 

html-Link
BB-Link