Www.WorldHistory.Biz
Login *:
Password *:
     Register

 

3-06-2015, 02:12

Conclusion

We have reviewed several dietary components that have been implicated in the pathogenesis of cardiovascular disease. The contribution of most nutrients appears to revolve around their ability to influence the serum lipid profile - total cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol, triglycerides, and the various apoproteins.

There is a need to look beyond serum lipids, however. Besides influencing a specific set of measurable laboratory parameters, nutrients must impact the pathogenesis of disease through biochemical and molecular alterations at the cellular level. This milieu of biochemical reactions and interactions is ultimately the most consequential to the dietary pathogenesis, prevention, and therapy of cardiovascular disease. We will doubtless continue to receive information about the important benefits of “nutrient A” on “function B,” and physicians, scientists, patients, and the public will try to make sense of these assertions.

Yet one must remember that nutrients are but small components of the whole chemical “package” that makes up a particular food or group of foods. Other properties of additional components in food may work synergistically or antagonistically, or act as innocent bystanders in cardiovascular disease chemo-protection and pathogenesis. It is unlikely that in years to come a single nutrient - will be uncovered as “the cause” of CAD. More likely, further investigation will describe the subtle interactions of various dietary components with an individual’s genome, in concert with other cardiovascular risk factors, such as tobacco use, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, hypoestrogene-mia, stress, and obesity. Researchers probably will demonstrate that it is not just one or two nutrients or dietary factors that are critical, but the diet as a whole.

Consider an 88-year-old, generally healthy man who had a verified consumption of 20 to 30 whole eggs per day (Kern 1991). Despite this incredibly high daily cholesterol intake (12,953 micromoles), his total cholesterol was only 5.18 mmol per liter (200 mg per deciliter), and his LDL-cholesterol was 3.68 mmol per liter (142 mg per deciliter). It appears that he had compensated for his dietary excess by excreting excess cholesterol bound in bile acids in his stool. Thus, how an individual utilizes the diet biochemically may be as important as the diet itself.

We are not yet in a position to predict which people will do well with high cholesterol intake and which will not. In the meantime, it is prudent to follow the recent dietary guidelines of the National Research Council, which stress a diet containing 15 to 20 percent of calories from protein, 25 to 30 percent of calories from dietary fat, and the remaining calories from complex carbohydrates, such as whole grains, vegetables, and fruits.

These guidelines were put forward as death rates from CAD were falling, and there is no shortage of advocacy groups ready and willing to take credit for this reduction. But it is most probably the result of many lifestyle changes, among them declining use of tobacco (at least in the United States, when considered for all members of the population combined); better emergency medical services; improved inhospital treatments; and, of course, dietary modifications. As noted, change in diet has a particular appeal as an explanation because it is the only one of these factors that daily affects each and every member of society. And, as the new millennium dawns, it would seem that dietary intervention to prevent CAD has proved to be a successful means of secondary prevention for those people who have already incurred a cardiac event, even if the utility of such intervention as a means of primary prevention, applied to entire populations, remains controversial.

We should also bear in mind that the debate over diet and heart disease is being conducted in a very public arena, and an arena in which diet and heart disease are only one aspect of a more general tension over questions focusing on personal risk and responsibility. In the case of heart disease, these questions have stirred a broad-based popular reaction. No longer are discussions of diet and the heart confined to the pages of medical journals, but they can now be found in practically every issue of widely circulating newspapers and magazines. One good example is an extensive and detailed analysis questioning the overall importance of cholesterol in heart disease - indeed, dismissing “The Cholesterol Myth” - in the Atlantic Magazine (Moore 1989a). In the same year that this essay appeared, it was also published in expanded form as a book (Moore 1989b).

Public skepticism about the importance of diet in heart disease is also apparent in cartoons. One, in the New Yorker magazine (January 16, 1989: 39), shows a man starting to eat a huge oatmeal muffin. The caption reads:“Wellness update:Thirty-year-old man starting on the twenty-five-thousand-pound oat-bran muffin he must consume over forty years in order to reduce significantly his risk of death from high cholesterol.”

This and countless other less-than-reverent cartoons constitute widespread cultural markers that express a number of popular reactions to the diet-heart hypothesis. First, they ventilate frustration at the gospel of eating for one’s heart (or for health in general). And given a culture in which the average person is daily bombarded with images of food, with much of the easiest food to acquire and consume that which is likely to be least beneficial for preventing heart disease, this frustration is understandable. Such cartoons also reflect a general lack of conviction that altered diets will “work” against heart disease - a skepticism that primary prevention trials have thus far failed to address convincingly. At a lay level, most people know (or have heard of) someone who has lived to a ripe old age while engaging in near-constant dietary indiscretions, whereas someone who ate “right” and stayed fit may have suffered an early death. Epidemiologists might discount the relevance of such anecdotes, but they can have a major impact on popular perceptions of risk and disease, especially when the behavior that is being advocated may be neither easy nor (seemingly) pleasurable.

The popular reaction against dietary constraints also raises fundamental questions of personal versus public responsibility. If someone has CAD, whose fault is it? The choices people make about what to eat are limited by the cultural world in which they live, so to what extent is the larger society to be held responsible? And, if one is personally accountable for what foods are consumed, then should a “healthy lifestyle” make a difference in terms of how much one pays for health or life insurance?

Finally, what is the disease here? Is it CAD, or is it high cholesterol? We should not lose sight of the fact that blood lipids are merely surrogates for what is most important - the disability and death that come from CAD and CVD. Keeping track of these differences is important. First, it can help to maintain focus on the ultimate goals of therapy and not allow us to become sidetracked by that which is easier to effect. Second, it will prevent the labeling of a large percentage of the population as “diseased” simply because of a high lipid profile. The answers to the questions raised in this chapter are unlikely to come purely from the accumulation of more and more data, because the prevention controversies are also fueled by “hidden ideological, structural, and professional fac-tors”(Aronowitz 1994).

Melissa H. Olken Joel D. Howell

Bibliography

Abbey, M., P J. Nestel, and P A. Baghurst. 1993 Antioxidant vitamins and low-density lipoprotein oxidation. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 58: 525-32.

Ahrens, E. H.,W. Insull, J. Hirsch, et al. 1959. The effect on human serum-lipids of a dietary fat, highly unsaturated but poor in essential fatty acids. Lancet 1:117-19.

Allbutt, Clifford. 1915. Diseases of the arteries, including angina pectoris. 2 vols. London.

Armstrong, B. K., J. I. Mann, A. M. Adelstein, and F Eskin. 1975. Commodity consumption and ischemic heart disease mortality, with special reference to dietary practices. Journal of Chronic Disease 28: 455-67.

Aronowitz, Robert. 1994. Trouble in prevention. Journal of General Internal Medicine 9: 475-8.

Bjorkhem, I., A. Henriksson-Freyschuss, O. Breuer, et al. 1991. The antioxidant butylated hydroxytoluene protects against atherosclerosis. Atherosclerosis and Thrombosis 11: 15-22.

Blankenhorn, D. H., S. PAzen, D. M. Kramsch, et al. 1993. Coronary angiographic changes with lovastatin therapy. Annals of Internal Medicine 119: 969-76.

Blankenhorn, D. H., S. A. Nessim, R. L. Johnson, et al. 1987. Beneficial effects of combined colestipol-niacin therapy on coronary atherosclerosis and coronary venous bypass grafts. Journal of the American Medical Association 257:3233-40.

Bronte-Stewart, B., A. Antonis, L. Eales, and J. F. Brock. 1956. Effects of feeding different fats on serum-cholesterol level. Lancet 2: 521-6.

Browner, Warren S., Janice Westenhouse, and Jeffrey A. Tice. 1991. What if Americans ate less fat? A quantitative estimate of the effect on mortality. Journal of the American Medical Association 265: 3285-91.

Burke, G. L., J. M. Sprafka, A. R. Folsom, et al. 1991. Trends in serum cholesterol levels from 1980-1987. New England Journal of Medicine 324: 941-6.

Castillo, L., M. Sanchez, J. Vogt, et al. 1995. Plasma arginine, cit-rulline, and ornithine kinetics in adults, with observa-

Tions on nitric oxide synthesis. American Journal of Physiology 268: E360-7.

Creager, M. A., J. P. Cooke, M. E. Mendelsohn, et al. 1990. Impaired vasodilation of forearm resistance vessels in hypercholesterolemic humans. Journal of Clinical Investigation 86: 228-34.

Dalderup, L. M. 1973. Ozone, vitamin E, fatty acids, prostaglandins, atherosclerosis and its complications (letter to the editor). Archives of Environmental Health 27: 58.

Dawber, D. V, and L. N. Katz. 1943. Experimental atherosclerosis in the chick. Archives of Pathology 36:473-92.

Egashira, K.,T. Inou, Y. Hirooka, et al. 1993. Evidence of impaired endothelium-dependent coronary vasodilatation in patients with angina pectoris and normal coronary angiograms. New England Journal of Medicine 328:1659-64.

Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults. 1993. Summary of the second report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP). Journal of the American Medical Association 269: 3015-23.

Frick, M. H., O. Elo, K. Happa, et al. 1987. Helsinki heart study: Primary-prevention trial with gemfibrozil in middle-aged men with dyslipidemia: Safety of treatment, changes in risk factors, and incidence of coronary heart disease. New England Journal of Medicine 817: 1237-45.

Friend, B. 1967. Nutrients in the United States food supply: A review of trends, 1909-1913 to 1965. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 20:907-14.

Godfried, S. L., G. F Combs, J. M. Saroka, and L. A. Dillingham. 1989. Potentiation of atherosclerotic lesions in rabbits by a high dietary level of vitamin E. British Journal of Nutrition 61: 607-17.

Jenkins, D. J. A.,T. M. S. Wolever, A. V Rao, et al. 1993. Effect on blood lipids of very high intakes of fiber in diets low in saturated fat and cholesterol. New England Journal of Medicine 329: 21-6.

Jeserich, M.,T. Munzel, H. Just, and H. Drexler. 1992. Reduced plasma L-arginine in hypercholesterolaemia (letter). Lancet 339: 561.

Jialal, I., and S. M. Grundy. 1993. Effect of combined supplementation with alpha-tocopherol, ascorbate, and beta carotene on low-density lipoprotein oxidation. Circulation 88: 2780-6.

Kannel, W. B. 1987. New perspectives on cardiovascular risk factors. American Heart Journal 114: 213-19.

Kannel, W. B., W. P. Castelli, T. Gordon, and P. M. McNamara. 1971. Serum cholesterol, lipoproteins, and the risk of coronary heart disease: The Framingham Study. Annals of Internal Medicine 74:1-12.

Kato, H., J. Tillotson, M. Z. Nichamen, et al. 1973. Epidemiologic studies of coronary heart disease and stroke in Japanese men living in Japan, Hawaii and California: Serum lipids and diet. American Journal of Epidemiology 97: 372-85.

Kern, F. 1991. Normal plasma cholesterol in an 88-year-old man who eats 25 eggs a day. New England Journal of Medicine 324: 896-9.

Keys, Ancel. 1980. Seven countries:A multivariate analysis of death and coronary heart disease. Cambridge, Mass.

1983. From Naples to seven countries - A sentimental journey. Progress in Biochemical Pharmacology 19:1-30.

Keys, Ancel, H. L. Taylor, H. Blackburn, et al. 1963. Coronary heart disease among Minnesota business and professional men followed for fifteen years. Circulation 28: 381-95.

Kummerow, FA. 1979. Nutrition imbalance and angiotoxins as dietary risk factors in coronary heart disease. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 32: 58-83.

Leary, Timothy. 1935. Pathology of coronary sclerosis. American Heart Journal 10: 328-37.

Leibowitz, J. O. 1970. The history of coronary heart disease. Berkeley, Calif.

Linder, L.,W Kiowski, F R. Buhler, and T. P Luscher. 1990. Indirect evidence for release of endothelium-derived relaxing factor in human forearm circulation in vivo: Blunted response in essential hypertension. Circulation 81: 1762-7.

Lipid Research Clinics Program. 1984. The lipid research clinics coronary primary prevention trial results: I. Reduction in incidence of coronary heart disease. Journal of the American Medical Association 251: 351-64.

Mao, S. J., M. T. Yates, A. E. Rechtin, et al. 1991. Antioxidant activity of probucol and its analogues in hypercholes-terolemic Watanabe rabbits. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 34: 298-302.

Moore, Thomas J. 1989a. The cholesterol myth. Atlantic Magazine 264 (September): 37-40.

1989b. Heart failure: A critical inquiry into American medicine and the revolution in heart care. New York.

Nelson, A. M. 1972. Diet therapy in coronary disease: Effect on mortality of high-protein, high-seafood, fat-controlled diet. Geriatrics 24: 103-16.

NIH Consensus Development Panel. 1993. Triglyceride, high-density lipoprotein, and coronary heart disease. Journal of the American Medical Association 269: 505-10.

Ornish, D., S. E. Brown, L. W Scherwitz, et al. 1990. Can lifestyle changes reverse coronary heart disease? Lancet 336: 129-33.

Osborne, Oliver T. 1913. Disturbances of the heart: Discussion of the treatment of the heart in various disorders. Chicago.

Page, L., and R. M. Marston. 1979. Food consumption pattern - U. S. diet. In Proceedings of the conference on the decline in coronary heart disease mortality, ed. R. J Havilik and M. Feinleib, 236-43. U. S. Dept. of Health, Education and Welfare, Public Health Service, National Institute of Health, Washington, D. C. (NIH Pub. No. 79-1610).

Report of Inter-Society Commission for Heart Disease Resources. 1970. Circulation 42:A-55.

Sabate, J., G. E. Fraser, K. Burke, et al. 1993. Effects of walnuts on serum lipid levels and blood pressure in normal men. New England Journal of Medicine 328: 603-7.

Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study Group (4S). 1994. Randomized trial of cholesterol lowering in 4444 patients with coronary heart disease: The Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study. Lancet 344: 1383-9.

Schwartz, C. J.,A. J. Valente, and E. A. Sprague. 1993.A modern view of atherogenesis. American Journal of Cardiology 71:9B-14B.

Seely, S. 1981. Diet and coronary disease: A survey of mortality rates and food consumption statistics of 24 countries. Medical Hypotheses 7:907-18.

1988. Diet and coronary arterial disease: A statistical study. International Journal of Cardiology 20:183-92.

Sempos, C. T., J. I. Cleeman, M. D. Carroll, et al. 1993. Prevalence of high blood cholesterol among US adults. Journal of the American Medical Association 269: 3009-14.

Snapper, I. 1963. Diet and atherosclerosis: Truth and fiction. American Journal of Cardiology 11: 283-9.

Stampfer, M. J., G. A. Colditz, W C. Willett, et al. 1987. Coronary heart disease risk factors in women:The Nurses' Health Study experience. In Coronary heart disease in women, ed. E. Baker, B. Packard, N. K. Wenger, et al., 112-16.New York.

Stampfer, M. J., C. H. Hennekens, J. E. Manson, et al. 1993. Vitamin E consumption and risk of coronary heart disease in women. New England Journal of Medicine 328: 1444-9.

Steinberg, D. 1991. Alcohol and atherosclerosis. Annals of Internal Medicine 114:967-76.

1992. Antioxidants in the prevention of human atherosclerosis: Summary of the proceedings of a National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute workshop: September 5-6, 1991, Bethesda, Maryland. Circulation 85: 2338-43.

U. S. Senate Select Committee on Nutrition and Human Needs. 1977. Dietary Goals for the United States. Washington, D. C.

Vogel, Julius. [1847] 1847. The Pathological anatomy of the human body, trans. G. E. Day. Philadelphia, Pa.

Von Schacky, C. 1987. Prophylaxis of atherosclerosis with marine omega-3 fatty acids. Annals of Internal Medicine 107:890-9.

Walldius, G., J. Regnstrom, J. Nilsson, et al. 1993. The role of lipids and antioxidative factors for development of atherosclerosis. American Journal of Cardiology 71:15B-9B.

Warshafsky, S., R. S. Kamer, and S. L. Sivak. 1993. Effect of garlic on total serum cholesterol: A meta-analysis. Annals of Internal Medicine 119:599-605.

Watts, G. F, B. Lewis, J. N. H. Brunt, et al. 1992. Effects on coronary artery disease of lipid-lowering diet, or diet plus cholestyramine, in the St. Thomas's Atherosclerosis Regression Study (STARS).Lancet 339: 563-9.

WHO (World Health Organization). 1976. Myocardial infarction community registers. Copenhagen.

Zeiher, A. M., H. Drexler, H. Wollschlager, and H. Just. 1991. Modulation of coronary vasomotor in humans: Progressive endothelial dysfunction with different early stages of coronary atherosclerosis. Circulation 83: 391-401.

Zhu, B-Q., and WW Parmley. 1990. Modification of experimental and clinical atherosclerosis by dietary fish oil. American Heart Journal 119: 168-78.



 

html-Link
BB-Link