Www.WorldHistory.Biz
Login *:
Password *:
     Register

 

30-06-2015, 08:38

Analyzing Primary Sources

The Impact of the New World on Enlightenment Thinkers



The abbe Guillaume Thomas Francois Raynal (1713-1796) was a clergyman and intellectual who moved in the inner circles of the Enlightenment. As a senior cleric, he had access to the royal court; as a writer and intellectual, he worked with the encyclopedists and other authors who criticized France's institutions, including the Catholic Church of which Raynal himself was a part. Here, he tries to offer a perspective on the profound effects of discovering the Americas and ends by asking whether particular historical developments and institutions lead to the betterment of society.



Here has never been any event which has had more impact on the human race in general and for Europeans in particular, as that of the discovery of the New World, and the passage to the Indies around the Cape of Good Hope. It was then that a commercial revolution began, a revolution in the balance of power, and in the customs, the industries and the government of every nation. It was through this event that men in the most distant lands were linked by new relationships and new needs. The produce of equatorial regions were consumed in polar climes. The industrial products of the north were transported



To the south; the textiles of the Orient became the luxuries of Westerners; and everywhere men mutually exchanged their opinions, their laws, their customs, their illnesses, and their medicines, their virtues and their vices. Everything changed, and will go on changing. But will the changes of the past and those that are to come be useful to humanity? Will they give man one day more peace, more happiness, or more pleasure? Will his condition be better, or will it be simply one of constant change?



Source: Abbe Guillaume Thomas Francois Raynal, Philosophical and Political History of European Settlements and Trade in the Two Indies (1770), as cited in Dorinda Outram, The Enlightenment (Cambridge: 1995), p. 73.



Questions for Analysis



1.  Why does Raynal attribute such significance to the voyages of exploration that connected Europe to the Americas and to Africa and Asia? Which peoples were changed by these voyages?



2.  Why is Raynal concerned with people's conduct and happiness rather than, say, the wealth of states?



3.  Is Raynal clear about whether the changes he enumerates are a gain or a loss for humanity?



Even thinkers as radical as Raynal and Diderot hesitated to criticize the slave trade, however, and their hesitations are revealing about the tensions in Enlightenment thought. Enlightenment thinking began with the premise that individuals could reason for and govern themselves. Individual moral freedom lay at the heart of what the Enlightenment considered to be a just, stable, and harmonious society. Slavery defied natural law and natural freedom. Montesquieu, for instance, wrote that civil law created chains, but natural law would always break them. Nearly all Enlightenment thinkers condemned slavery in the metaphorical sense. That the “mind should break free of its chains” and that “despotism enslaved the king’s subjects” were phrases that echoed through much eighteenth-century writing. It was common for the central characters of eighteenth-century fiction, such as Voltaire’s hero Candide, to meet enslaved people, learning compassion as part of their moral education. Writers dealt more gingerly, however, with the actual enslavement and slave labor of Africans.



Some Enlightenment thinkers skirted the issue of slavery. Others reconciled principle and practice in different ways. Smith condemned slavery as uneconomical. Voltaire, quick to expose his contemporaries’ hypocrisy, wondered whether Europeans would look away if Europeans—rather than Africans—were enslaved. Voltaire, however, did not question his belief that Africans were inferior peoples. Montesquieu (who came from Bordeaux, one of the central ports for the Atlantic trade) believed that slavery debased master and slave alike. But he also argued that all societies balanced their systems of labor in accordance with their different needs, and slave labor was one such system.



 

html-Link
BB-Link