Armstrong, D. 1989. Horace. New Haven, CT.
Bowditch, P. L. 2001. Horace and the Gift Economy of Patronage. Berkeley.
Brown, P. M. 1993. Horace: Satires I. Warminster.
Davis, G. 1991. Polyhymnia: The Rhetoric of Horatian Literary Discourse. Berkeley.
Fitzgerald, W. 1995. Catullan Provocations: Lyric Poetry and the Drama of Position. Berkeley, Los Angeles, and London.
Fordyce, C. J., ed. 1961. Catullus: A Commentary. Oxford.
Fraenkel, E. 1957. Horace. Oxford.
Frank, T. 1928. Catullus and Horace. Oxford.
Freudenburg, K. 1993. The Walking Muse. Princeton, NJ.
Harrison, S. J., ed. 1995. Homage to Horace. Oxford.
Hurley, A. K. 2004. Catullus. London.
Krostenko, B. A. 2001a. Cicero, Catullus, and the Language of Social Performance. Chicago and London.
Lowrie, M. 1997. Horace’s Narrative Odes. Oxford.
Lyne, R. O. A. M. 1980. The Latin Love Poets from Catullus to Horace. Oxford.
Lyne, R. O. A. M. 1995. Horace: Behind the Public Poetry. New Haven, CT.
Mayer, R. G. 1994. Horace: Epistles, Book I. Cambridge.
McNeill, R. L. B. 2001. Horace: Image, Identity, and Audience. Baltimore.
Mendell, C. W. 1935. ‘‘Catullan Echoes in the Odes of Horace.’’ Classical Philology 30: 289-301.
Muecke, F., ed. 1993. Horace Satires II. Warminster.
Nappa, C. 2001. Aspects of Catullus’ Social Fiction. Frankfurt.
Nisbet, R. G. M., and M. Hubbard. 1970. A Commentary on Horace’s Odes: Book I. Oxford. Nisbet, R. G. M., and M. Hubbard. 1978. A Commentary on Horace’s Odes: Book II. Oxford. Nisbet, R. G. M., and N. Rudd. 2004. A Commentary on Horace’s Odes: Book III. Oxford. Oliensis, E. 1998. Horace and the Rhetoric ofAuthority. Cambridge.
Putnam, M. C. J. 1986. Artifices ofEternity. Berkeley.
Putnam, M. C. J. 2006. Poetic Interplay: Catullus and Horace. Princeton, NJ.
Quinn, K., ed. 1973a. Catullus: The Poems. 2nd edn. London and Basingstoke.
Ross, D. O., Jr. 1969. Style and Tradition in Catullus. Cambridge, MA.
Rudd, N. 1982. The Satires of Horace. Berkeley.
Selden, D. L. 1992. ‘‘Ceveat lector: Catullus and the Rhetoric of Performance.” In R. Hexter and D. Selden, eds., Innovations of Antiquity. New York and London. 461-512.
Shorey, P. 1960. Horace: Odes and Epodes. Chicago.
Skinner, M. B. 1989. ‘‘Ut decuit cinaediorem: Power, Gender, and Urbanity in Catullus 10.’’ Helios 16: 7-23.
Syndikus, H. P. 1984. Catull: Eine Interpretation. Erster Teil: Einleitung, Die kleinen Gedichte (1-60). Darmstadt.
Syndikus, H. P. 1987. Catull: Eine Interpretation. Dritter Teil: Die Epigramme (69-116). Darmstadt.
Syndikus, H. P. 1990. Catull: Eine Interpretation. Zweiter Teil: Diegrossen Gedichte (61-68). Darmstadt.
Thomson, D. F. S., ed. 1997. Catullus, Edited with a Textual and Interpretative Commentary. Toronto.
Watson, L. C. 2003. A Commentary on Horace’s Epodes. Oxford.
West, M. L. 1982. Greek Metre. Oxford.
Williams, G. 1985 [1968]. Tradition and Originality in Roman Poetry. 2nd edn. Oxford. Wiseman, T. P. 1985. Catullus and His World: A Reappraisal. Cambridge.
Woodman, T. 2002. ‘‘Biformis vates: The Odes, Catullus and Greek Lyric.’’ In Woodman and Feeney (2002: 54-64).
Woodman, T., and D. Feeney, eds. 2002. Traditions and Contexts in the Poetry of Horace. Cambridge.
Woodman, T., and D. West, eds. 1984. Poetry and Politics in the Age of Augustus. Cambridge. Wray, D. 2001. Catullus and the Poetics of Roman Manhood. Cambridge.
A Companion to Catullus Edited by Marilyn B. Skinner Copyright © 2007 by Blackwell Publishing Ltd
World History
