Www.WorldHistory.Biz
Login *:
Password *:
     Register

 

31-08-2015, 17:54

WORKS CITED

Adams, J. N. 1982. The Latin Sexual Vocabulary. Baltimore and London.

Adams, J. N. 1999. “Nominative Personal Pronouns and Some Patterns of Speech in Republican and Augustan Poetry.’’ In Adams and Meyer (1999: 97-133).

Adams, J. N., and R. G. Meyer, eds. 1999. Aspects of the Language of Latin Poetry = Proceedings of the British Academy 93. Oxford.

Chandler, D. 2002. Semiotics: The Basics. New York.

Coleman, R. G. G. 1999. ‘‘Poetic Diction, Poetic Discourse, and the Poetic Register.’’ In Adams and Meyer (1999: 21-93).

Conte, G. B. 1994. Latin Literature: A History. Trans. J. B. Solodow. Rev. D. Fowler and G. W. Most. Baltimore.

Ernout, A., and A. Meillet. 1967. Dictionaire etymologique de la langue Latine. 4th edn. Paris. Fitzgerald, W. 1995. Catullan Provocations: Lyric Poetry and the Drama of Position. Berkeley, Los Angeles, and London.

Fordyce, C. J., ed. 1961. Catullus: A Commentary. Oxford.

Fraenkel, E. 1955. ‘‘Vesper adest (Catullus LXII).’’ Journal of Roman Studies 45: 1-8. Gigante, V. 1978. ‘‘Motivi gnomici nella poesia di Catullo.’’ Vichiana 7: 257-67.

Gow, A. S. F. 1965. Theocritus Edited with a Translation and Commentary. Vol. 2. Cambridge. Heusch, H. 1954. Das Archaische in der Sprache Catulls. Bonn.

Hofmann, J. B. 1926. Lateinische Umgangssprache. Heidelberg.

Irvine, J. 2001. ‘‘ ‘Style’ as Distinctiveness: The Culture and Ideology of Linguistic Differentiation.’’ In P. Eckert and J. R. Rickford, eds., Style and Sociolinguistic Variation. Cambridge. 21-43.

Jocelyn, H. D. 1999. ‘‘The Arrangement and the Language of Catullus’ So-Called polymetra with Special Reference to the Sequence 10-11-12.’’ In Adams and Meyer (1999: 335-75). Kroll, W. 1924. Studien zum Verstdndnis der romischen Literatur. Stuttgart.

Krostenko, B. 2001b. ‘‘Arbitria urbanitatis: Language, Style, and Characterization in Catullus cc. 39 and 37,’’ Classical Antiquity 20.2: 239-72.

Kuhner, R. K., and C. Stegmann. 1976. Ausfiihrliche Grammatik der Lateinischen Sprache. Hanover.

Labov, W. 2001. Principles of Linguistic Change: Social Factors. Malden, MA.

Loefstedt, B. 1911. Philologischer Kommentar zur Peregrinatio Aetheriae: Untersuchungen zur Geschichte der Lateinischen Sprache. Uppsala and Leipzig.

Loomis, J. W. 1972. Studies in Catullan Verse: An Analysis of Word Types and Patterns in the Polymetra. Mnemosyne Supplement 24. Leiden.

Palmer, L. R. 1954. The Latin Language. London.

Palmer, L. R. 1980. The Greek Language. Atlantic Highlands, NJ.

Quinn, K., ed. 1973a. Catullus: The Poems. 2nd edn. London and Basingstoke.

Raven, D. S. 1965. Latin Meter. London.

Ross, D. O., Jr. 1969. Style and Tradition in Catullus. Cambridge, MA.

Sheets, G. A. 2001. ‘‘Rhythm in Catullus 34.’’ Memoirs of the American Academy in Rome 46: 11-21.

Skinner, M. B. 1991. ‘‘The Dynamics of Catullan Obscenity: cc. 37, 58 and 11.’’ Syllecta Classica 3: 1-11.

Skinner, M. B. 2003. Catullus in Verona: A Reading of the Elegiac Libellus, Poems 65-116. Columbus, OH.

Thomson, D. F. S., ed. 1997. Catullus, Edited with a Textual and Interpretative Commentary. Toronto.

Trypanis, C. A., trans. 1958. Callimachus: Aetia, Iambi, Lyric Poems, Hecale, Minor Epic and Elegiac Poems, and Other Fragments. Cambridge, MA.

West, M. L. 1982. Greek Metre. Oxford.

Wills, J. 1996. Repetition in Latin Poetry: Figures of Allusion. Oxford.

A Companion to Catullus Edited by Marilyn B. Skinner Copyright © 2007 by Blackwell Publishing Ltd



 

html-Link
BB-Link