Several critical editions are available: L. Spengel’s Anaximenis Ars Rhetorica quae vulgo fertur Aristotelis ad Alexandrum (Turici et Vitoduri: 1844; repr. Hildesheim: 1981) gives the Greek text with a commentary in Latin, M. Fuhrmann, Anaximenes, Ars Rhetorica quae vulgo fertur Aristotelis ad Alexandrum2 (Munich: 2000), has a Greek text, and P. Chiron, Ps.-Aristote, Rhetorique a Alexandre, Bude edition (Paris: 2002), has a Greek text and a French translation and commentary. For an English translation, see E. S. Forster, ‘De Rhetorica ad Alexandrum’, in W. D. Ross (ed.), The Works of Aristotle 11 (Oxford: 1924) and H. Rackham, Rhetorica ad Alexandrum, Loeb Classical Library, Aristotle 16 (London: 1937; repr. 1983). For a Spanish translation and new insights, see J. Sanchez Sanz, Retorica a Alejandro (Salamanca: 1989). On the transmission of the text, see M. Fuhrmann, Untersu-chungen zur Textgeschichte der pseudo-aristotelischen Alexander-Rhetorik (der tekhne des Anaximenes von Lampsakos) (Wiesbaden: 1965) and P. Chiron, ‘La Tradition Manuscrite de la Rhetorique a Alexandre: Prolegomenes a une Nouvelle lldition Critique’, RHT 30 (2000), pp. 17-69. On Anaximenes, see P. Wendland, Anaximenes von Lampsakos (Berlin: 1905), K. Barwick, ‘Die ‘‘Rhetorik ad Alexandrum’’ und Anaximenes, Alkidamas, Isokrates, Aristoteles und die Theodecteia’ I, Philolo-gus 110 (1966), pp. 212-245 and II, Philologus 111 (1967), pp. 47-55, and I. Beck, Untersuchungen zur Theorie des Genos Symbuleutikon (Diss. Hambourg:
1970), pp. 89-167. On rhetorical and oratorical aspects, see F. Blass, Die attische Beredsamkeit2 2 (Leipzig: 1892; repr. Hildesheim: 1962), pp. 378-399 and G. A. Kennedy, The Art of Persuasion in Greece (Princeton: 1963), pp. 114-123.
World History
