
	Top News: The Year in Special Operations 2014-2015 Medieval Warfare (The Putnam Pictorial Sources Series) Great Sailing Ships The Old World and the New: 1492-1650 The Iron Age in Northern Britain: Celts and Romans, Natives and Invaders Great Ages of Man - Historic India Making America: A History of the United States, Volume 1: To 1877 Bill O'Reilly's Legends and Lies: The Real West Redlegs. The U.S. Artillery From the Civil War to the Spanish-American War, 1861-1898 (G.I. Series 11) Bombs over Bikini: The World's First Nuclear Disaster

Contact

7-09-2015, 02:39

Seleucid Dynasty

The Seleucid (suh-LEW-suhd) Dynasty maintained the preeminence of Greek culture over the indigenous peoples of the ancient Near East through a process of urbanization and economic centralization.

Date: 312 b. c.e.-64 b. c.e.

Category: Cities and civilizations

Locale: Mesopotamia, Coele-Syria (now Bekaa Valley), Anatolia, Persia

History After the death of Alexander the Great in 323 b. c.e., there was a period of intense conflict among Alexander’s generals, known as the Diadochi, for control of his empire. Though the idea of maintaining a single empire was their goal, no individual general was able to impose his will on the others, and the empire was divided among them. Seleucus I, one of the Diadochi, fought with Antigonus I Monophthalmos, who succeeded to the Macedonian throne, over control of Mesopotamia. Ptolemy Soter, who ruled Egypt, helped Seleucus defeat Demetrius Poliorcetes, the son and coregent of Antigonus, at Gaza in 312 b. c.e. After this victory, Seleucus was able to take Babylon, which he made the seat of his government, declaring himself king and thereby establishing the Seleucid Dynasty as Seleucus I Nicator. Afterthe Battle of Ipsus in 301 b. c.e., during which Antigonus died, there was a realignment of borders among the surviving Diadochi. Seleucus added the region from Syria to Babylon to his territories. Ptolemy I took Coele-Syria, Palestine, and the Phoenician cities, although Seleucus believed that these territories rightly belonged to him. Seleucus I was assassinated in 281 b. c.e. by Ptolemy Ceraunus, the son of Ptolemy I.

The next five Seleucid kings, Antiochus I Soter (r. 281-261 b. c.e.), Antiochus II Theos (r. 261-246 b. c.e.), Seleucus II Callinicus (r. 246-225 b. c.e.), Seleucus III Cernaunus (r. 225-223 b. c.e.), and Antiochus III the Great (r. 223-187 b. c.e.), fought five wars (the Syrian Wars) with the Ptolemies over disputed territories until Antiochus the Great succeeded in taking Coele-Syria and Palestine from the Ptolemies in 198 b. c.e. by de-

Feating the Egyptian general Scopas at the Battle of Paneas. Antiochus set about modernizing his kingdom by uniting military and civil administration. This modernization allowed the Seleucid kingdom to exercise enormous control over the politics, economy, and culture of the ancient Near East. When Antiochus the Great turned his attention to territories in Anatolia and Greece, he came into conflict with the Romans, who defeated him at the Battle of Magnesia ad Sipylum in 189 b. c.e. and ended Seleucid expansion in the west. In 187 b. c.e., Antiochus fell in battle and was succeeded by his son Seleucus IV Philopator (r. 187-175 b. c.e.). His uneventful reign ended with his assassination by his minister Heliodorus, whose unsuccessful coup d’etat was put down by Seleucus’s brother, who succeeded him as Antiochus IV Epiphanes (r. 175-164 b. c.e.).

Antiochus IV tried to manipulate factions within the Jewish community of Palestine in order to completely dominate the region. Not content with the results of his manipulation, he brutally proscribed the practice of Judaism and erected a statue of Zeus in the temple of Jerusalem. This was a departure from the Seleucid policy of religious tolerance. Antiochus’s antireligious policies sparked the Maccabean revolution in 168 b. c.e. The conflict continued for twenty-five years. The fighting led to the end of Seleu-cid rule in Palestine and the establishment of an independent Jewish kingdom, the Hasmonean Dynasty (c. 143-37 b. c.e.), The Books of Daniel and 1 and 2 Maccabees speak of the Jewish resistance to Antiochus.

Following the death of Antiochus IV in 164 b. c.e., the reigns of the remaining Seleucid kings were marked by bitter and almost continuous civil wars. These made it impossible for the Seleucids to maintain control over their vast territories. These began slipping from their control until by 141 b. c.e., all lands east of the Euphrates River were lost. It was not long before the Seleucids were able to control little more than Syria and Cilicia. Pompey the Great ended the Seleucid Dynasty in 64 b. c.e., when he incorporated Syria into the Roman provincial system.

Settlements and Economics Ahigh standard of urbanization marked the Seleucid territories. Seleucus I built several cities. The most important ones he named for himself: Seleucia. One of the three Seleucias was located on the northern coast of Syria four miles (six kilometers) north of the Orontes River. Its location on the sea made it an important communications and commercial center. His successors built another city, sixteen miles (twenty-six kilometers) inland at the intersection of major land routes connecting Syria with Mesopotamia and Anatolia. This city was named Antioch in honor of Seleucus’s father, and it replaced Babylon as the center of east-west trade. Antioch had a population that eventually reached 500,000 and was the political, commercial, and cultural capital of the Seleucid Dynasty. Among the other important cities founded by the Seleucids were Antioch of Pisidia, Edessa, Beroea (later Veroia), and Dura-Europus (later Salahiyeh). These became important centers for the dissemination of Hellenistic culture, which became dominant in Seleucid territories.

The Seleucid economic system was marked by centralization that led to economic exploitation of the indigenous population of its territories and the development of state monopolies to institutionalize economic control. Trade, except for royal taxes, was free. The ruthless economic exploitation that characterized Seleucid rule was an important cause of the kingdom’s fall. The Macedonian elite who controlled the economy had no long-range economic development in sight. Their principal concern was for immediate profit. Merchants cooperated with the ruling elite, who were supported by an army made up of mercenaries determined to maintain the political and economic status quo.

Government The Seleucid kingdom was the most heterogenous of all the Hellenistic kingdoms. Its size was immense and its population diverse. Throughout its history, a Greek-speaking aristocratic class of Macedonian origin dominated the Seleucid state. In Anatolia and Mesopotamia, the Seleucids ruled the local population directly, but in the Persian territories, a local nobility administered the region for them. Although their political center was in Syria, the Seleucids wanted to extend their influence westward to the Aegean but were unable to do so because of the rise of Rome and the civil wars that destabilized the Seleucid state.

Top News:

Seleucid Dynasty